1995
DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(95)98203-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid supplementation for ruminants fed low-quality forage diets: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chelated minerals are more available than their inorganic counterparts for utilisation by ruminants and so are preferred for inclusion into animal diets. A combination of molasses and chelated minerals as feed-blocks could be even more beneficial as a supplement for forage consuming animals [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chelated minerals are more available than their inorganic counterparts for utilisation by ruminants and so are preferred for inclusion into animal diets. A combination of molasses and chelated minerals as feed-blocks could be even more beneficial as a supplement for forage consuming animals [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies are required to determine the ability of animals and the time required to change feeding rate according to changes in MLB composition. In line with this, Bowman et al [6] concluded that the correlations between feeding duration, feeding frequency, and intake found with loose supplements could not be extrapolated to molasses supplements. Finally, feeding frequency and duration of MLB in the present study did not differ between high and low feed availability when animals were offered OH, suggesting that low-quality forages fed continuously could increase the basal attendance of animals to MLB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the relationship between MLB feeding behaviour of individual animals and fed as a group and the quantity and quality of forage available measured over a long-term grazing study. Previous studies [14,15] also reported that the intake of molasses-based supplements can be influenced by forage availability but that feeding behaviour has not been adequately addressed in those studies [6]. Moreover, feeding rate was affected both across and within feed types, increasing at low feed availability even during short periods of rotational grazing (e.g., OC) or during hay supplementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considerando que a rotação dos animais nos piquetes a cada 28 dias fosse uma das causas, apesar de nenhum tratamento ter sido continuamente beneficiado, a explicação mais razoável é que as oscilações no GPD decorreram de diferenças (1) nas Tabela 5 -Pesos vivos médios, inicial (PV i ) e final (PV f ), e médias de ganhos de peso diário (GPD), em kg, obtidos para os cinco tratamentos características das pastagens em cada piquete, que geraram diferenciais no consumo de pasto e na digestibilidade da forragem consumida; (2) no consumo de suplementos entre os animais de mesmo tratamento, problema amplamente discutido por Bowman et al (1995); e (3) entre os animais, relacionadas à capacidade de consumo, exigência de energia de mantença e concentração de energia no peso ganho, em cada período. Nas condições deste trabalho, as alterações no CMS de pasto, ou na qualidade da forragem, poderiam explicar a maior parte das oscilações nas médias de GPD, uma vez que os animais dependiam principalmente A eficiência alimentar (EA) dos animais suplementados no período compreendido entre o final de agosto e início de setembro foi de 0,11 kg de ganho/kg de MS ingerida e dos animais não-suplementados, de 0,012.…”
Section: Quantidade Fornecida (Amount Furnished) % Atendida (% Supplunclassified