2005
DOI: 10.1002/fld.816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid vorticity computation in non-spherical bubble dynamics

Abstract: SUMMARYThe purpose of this work is to compare e ciency of a number of numerical techniques of computation of liquid vorticity from non-spherical bubble oscillations. The techniques based on the ÿnite-di erence method (FDM), the collocation method (one with di erentiating (CMd) the integral boundary condition and another without it (CM)) and the Galerkin method (GM) have been considered. The centraldi erence approximations are used in FDM. Sinus functions are chosen as the basis in GM. Problems of decaying a sm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as shown in [10], in the problems considered in this paper, using central differences is acceptable because of the presence of dissipative viscous terms in (10). Our calculations show that on fine grids, central and upstream one-sided differences give the same numerical solution.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problem Using Continuity And Motion Equatsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, as shown in [10], in the problems considered in this paper, using central differences is acceptable because of the presence of dissipative viscous terms in (10). Our calculations show that on fine grids, central and upstream one-sided differences give the same numerical solution.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problem Using Continuity And Motion Equatsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In this case, due to the lower order of the approximation by one-sided differences, the computation time increases significantly. It has also been shown [10] that the approach employed in the present work is more effective than the Bubnov-Galerkin method and the collocation method. We also note that all the results presented in this study were tested for convergence by successive refinement of the computation grid.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problem Using Continuity And Motion Equatmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This function is determined from a partial differential equation with an integral boundary condition. In contrast to other studies (see [54,56]), in this paper, the vorticity diffusion is calculated by a finite-difference method [57].The system of equations is solved numerically using a Runge-Kutta method of high-order accuracy [58] with a variable time step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%