2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquidity and market efficiency in cryptocurrencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
138
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
14
138
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this study, we take q min = −25 and q max = 25, and investigate a relationship between multifractality degree ∆h and market efficiency as measured by the Hurst exponent h(2). To examine the relationship between market efficiency and liquidity, we follow Wei (2018) and use the Amihud illiquidity measure as proxy for illiquidity. The Amihud illiquidity (ILLIQ) is defined as…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we take q min = −25 and q max = 25, and investigate a relationship between multifractality degree ∆h and market efficiency as measured by the Hurst exponent h(2). To examine the relationship between market efficiency and liquidity, we follow Wei (2018) and use the Amihud illiquidity measure as proxy for illiquidity. The Amihud illiquidity (ILLIQ) is defined as…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a comprehensive review of the bitcoin efficiency literature to date, see Bundi and Wildi (). Note that some research on efficiency has been extended to cryptocurrencies beyond bitcoin (Brauneis & Mestel, ; Wei, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier papers have been focusing on the characteristics (Selgin 2015;Böhme et al 2015;Ammous 2018), volatility measurement (Katsiampa 2017(Katsiampa , 2019a(Katsiampa , 2019bChaim and Laurini 2018;Beneki et al 2019;, and inefficiency in the markets of digital coins (Urquhart 2016;Nadarajah and Chu 2017;Bariviera 2017). Another strand of papers have centered their interest on speculation and hedging properties in virtual currency markets (Dyhrberg 2016;Bouri et al 2017;Fang et al 2019) while others investigate liquidity characteristics of cryptocurrencies (Wei 2018; . Extant empirical testing generally tends to focus on high-capitalization cryptocurrencies in order to ascertain whether coins such as Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin, or Stellar could substitute Bitcoin regarding investors' preferences in a noteworthy extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%