2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1919522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquidity Measures, Liquidity Drivers and Expected Returns on an Early Call Auction Market

Abstract: Liquidity measures, liquidity drivers, and expected returns on an early call auction market Abstract:We analyze the impact of illiquidity on asset pricing on a rather stable stock market in a volatile economic environment, the Berlin Stock Exchange from 1892 to 1913. We use a Lesmond et al. (1999) measure of transaction costs to proxy illiquidity. Our results show that transaction costs were low and comparable to today's costs. However, the illiquidity risk premium was considerably higher. Applying a conditio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gehrig and Fohlin (2006), for example, found remarkably low trading costs among a nearly comprehensive set of stocks trading in Berlin for four benchmark years (1880, 1890, 1900, and 1910). Burhop and Gelman (2011) have confirmed earlier findings using a sample of 27 frequently traded stocks over the period 1891 to 1912. New work on the relatively late appearing Stockholm Stock Exchange, starting in 1901, shows another story-an exchange with a low number of stocks, low liquidity, and high and fixed transaction costs.…”
Section: Market Liquidity Reflects Information Flowsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Gehrig and Fohlin (2006), for example, found remarkably low trading costs among a nearly comprehensive set of stocks trading in Berlin for four benchmark years (1880, 1890, 1900, and 1910). Burhop and Gelman (2011) have confirmed earlier findings using a sample of 27 frequently traded stocks over the period 1891 to 1912. New work on the relatively late appearing Stockholm Stock Exchange, starting in 1901, shows another story-an exchange with a low number of stocks, low liquidity, and high and fixed transaction costs.…”
Section: Market Liquidity Reflects Information Flowsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similarly, Acharya and Pedersen (2005) use another indicator of illiquidity (Amihud's illiquidity ratio) and show that liquidity and Illiquidity risk are significantly considered in the asset pricing on NYSE and AMEX from 1962 to 1995 (the corresponding monthly premium is about 4.6%). This is consistent with the results of Chan andFaff (2005), Bollar et al (2008), Burhop and Gelman (2015) and Lesmond et al (1999). Contrary to the previous results, Soosung and Chensheng (2005), find that it is difficult to conclude that there is a premium for liquidity risk on the British market between 1997 and 2004, regardless of the portfolio formation strategy.…”
Section: The Liquidity Risk Premiumsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…By the 1790s, the New York and Philadelphia exchanges were using auctions to sell securities (Sobel 2000; Vitiello and Thomas 2010). Auction-like mechanisms were introduced in Paris around 1801 for public debt (Hautcoeur and Riva 2011), and in Berlin later in the nineteenth century for stocks (Burhop and Gelman 2011). 57 The open outcry system in the Amsterdam Exchange was most likely adopted in the 1830s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%