2017
DOI: 10.12775/cjfa.2016.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquidity-Profitability Tradeoff Existence in Turkey: An Empirical Investigation Under Structural Equation Modeling

Abstract: Firms in emerging markets could show a tendency to have high liquidity positions by ignoring the liquidity-profitability tradeoff in terms of working capital management due to gained experiences from stressed times. Accordingly, this study empirically examines the validity of liquidity-profitability tradeoff in Turkish market via structural equation modeling. The functions of liquidity and profitability as latent variables of the model are constituted from Piotroski's criterias of liquidity/solvency, operating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most previous literature has found a trade-off between liquidity and performance in financial management decisions, we find a statistically significant positive relationship between cash holdings and profitability for our sample of Spanish FFs, which means that a high level of cash holding not only benefits family objectives but also increases a firm's financial objectives through adequate management of liquid assets. This result can be seen as an important contribution to the knowledge on FFs and it is in line with a trend of literature supporting that the traditional liquidity-profitability trade-off may not be valid in some markets and for some particular types of businesses (Afza & Nazir, 2007;Baser et al, 2017;Terreno et al, 2020;Vazquez Carranza et al, 2017). In this vein, optimal liquidity management has the ability to involve all the operational components so that under some particular circumstances, the evolution of the liquidity and performance of a firm may come close.…”
Section: Are Cash Holdings Associated With Improved Family Firm Perfo...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although most previous literature has found a trade-off between liquidity and performance in financial management decisions, we find a statistically significant positive relationship between cash holdings and profitability for our sample of Spanish FFs, which means that a high level of cash holding not only benefits family objectives but also increases a firm's financial objectives through adequate management of liquid assets. This result can be seen as an important contribution to the knowledge on FFs and it is in line with a trend of literature supporting that the traditional liquidity-profitability trade-off may not be valid in some markets and for some particular types of businesses (Afza & Nazir, 2007;Baser et al, 2017;Terreno et al, 2020;Vazquez Carranza et al, 2017). In this vein, optimal liquidity management has the ability to involve all the operational components so that under some particular circumstances, the evolution of the liquidity and performance of a firm may come close.…”
Section: Are Cash Holdings Associated With Improved Family Firm Perfo...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover debt ratio shows a significant negative relationship with logarithm of sales and current ratio with their coefficient -0.648 and -0.582. This means large firm maintains lower debt than small firms and low leveraged firms maintain high liquidity compare to high leveraged firms and these relationships also same as the study of Usman, Shaikh, and Khan, (2017); Baser et al (2016) and Vintila and Nenu (2016).…”
Section: Correlation Analysissupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The most frequently diagnosed dependence is the negative dependence. This has been confirmed, for example, by Baser (2016), Nishanthini and Meerajancy (2015). Although it appears less frequently, positive dependence has been confirmed empirically (see Table 5).…”
Section: Institutional and Macroeconomic Moderators Of The Relationship Between Profitability And Liquiditymentioning
confidence: 59%