2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.824166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquidity Risk and Contagion

Abstract: This paper explores liquidity risk in a system of interconnected financial institutions when these institutions are subject to regulatory solvency constraints and mark their assets to market. When the market's demand for illiquid assets is less than perfectly elastic, sales by distressed institutions depress the market prices of such assets. Marking to market of the asset book can induce a further round of endogenously generated sales of assets, depressing prices further and inducing further sales. Contagious … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
138
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
138
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The writing-down of assets, due to mark-to-market accounting caused a tightening of capital adequacy requirements, forcing banks to securitize and sell their assets. Due to illiquidity in the market, such forced sales caused further deterioration in the values of these assets, which, in turn, caused additional write-downs and additional forced sales and so on (see Cifuentes, Ferrucci, and Shin [2005], Allen and Carletti [2008], Heaton, Lucas, and McDonald [2010]). Thus, it was alleged that mark-to-market accounting had procyclical properties and had entrapped banks in a self-confirming downward spiral.…”
Section: Procyclicality Of Mark-to-market Accounting For Financial Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The writing-down of assets, due to mark-to-market accounting caused a tightening of capital adequacy requirements, forcing banks to securitize and sell their assets. Due to illiquidity in the market, such forced sales caused further deterioration in the values of these assets, which, in turn, caused additional write-downs and additional forced sales and so on (see Cifuentes, Ferrucci, and Shin [2005], Allen and Carletti [2008], Heaton, Lucas, and McDonald [2010]). Thus, it was alleged that mark-to-market accounting had procyclical properties and had entrapped banks in a self-confirming downward spiral.…”
Section: Procyclicality Of Mark-to-market Accounting For Financial Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper focuses on financial contagion through linkages between banks. Contagion could, though, also be driven by information orVas analyzed by Cifuentes et al (2004)Vby the sale of illiquid assets by distressed banks to meet regulatory capital requirements. 1 Moreover, the failure of a large number of banks could as well be the result of a macroeconomic shock which affected institutions exposed to a common risk more or less simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these authors assume a fixed structure of interbank claims, and therefore fail to capture all of the ramifications of a bank failure. Cifuentes, Ferrucci, and Shin (2005) show that when prices are allowed to change endogenously, the impact of an initial shock may be considerable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%