2021
DOI: 10.3389/frai.2020.508725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Listener Modeling and Context-Aware Music Recommendation Based on Country Archetypes

Abstract: Music preferences are strongly shaped by the cultural and socio-economic background of the listener, which is reflected, to a considerable extent, in country-specific music listening profiles. Previous work has already identified several country-specific differences in the popularity distribution of music artists listened to. In particular, what constitutes the “music mainstream” strongly varies between countries. To complement and extend these results, the article at hand delivers the following major contribu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recommendation engines 4 of the world's largest music streaming platforms often use minimal musical information in their attempts to predict whether a given user will enjoy listening to a particular song, instead modeling listener preferences using other information about the similarity of users, such as the particular clusters of songs or artists in common across users' playlists, regardless of musical content (Jacobson, Murali, Newett, Whitman, & Yon, 2016). This approach is consistent with experimental work demonstrating the value of social information in musical preferences (Salganik, Dodds, & Watts, 2006), and, in real-world Spotify data, the fact that musical preferences and microgenres are predictable from users' age, sex, language, and geographical proximity (Schedl, Bauer, Reisinger, Kowald, & Lex, 2021; Way, Garcia-Gathright, & Cramer, 2020). Therefore, although we agree with the commentators that developing an understanding of esthetic preferences in music is a high priority for musicality research, we do not expect it to be easy.…”
Section: Priorities and Open Questions On The Nature Of Musicalitysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The recommendation engines 4 of the world's largest music streaming platforms often use minimal musical information in their attempts to predict whether a given user will enjoy listening to a particular song, instead modeling listener preferences using other information about the similarity of users, such as the particular clusters of songs or artists in common across users' playlists, regardless of musical content (Jacobson, Murali, Newett, Whitman, & Yon, 2016). This approach is consistent with experimental work demonstrating the value of social information in musical preferences (Salganik, Dodds, & Watts, 2006), and, in real-world Spotify data, the fact that musical preferences and microgenres are predictable from users' age, sex, language, and geographical proximity (Schedl, Bauer, Reisinger, Kowald, & Lex, 2021; Way, Garcia-Gathright, & Cramer, 2020). Therefore, although we agree with the commentators that developing an understanding of esthetic preferences in music is a high priority for musicality research, we do not expect it to be easy.…”
Section: Priorities and Open Questions On The Nature Of Musicalitysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The recommendation engines 4 of the world's largest music streaming platforms often use minimal musical information in their attempts to predict whether a given user will enjoy listening to a particular song, instead modeling listener preferences using other information about the similarity of users, such as the particular clusters of songs or artists in common across users' playlists, regardless of musical content (Jacobson et al 2016). This approach is consistent with experimental work demonstrating the value of social information in musical preferences (Salganik et al 2006), and, in real-world Spotify data, the fact that musical preferences and microgenres are predictable from users' age, sex, language, and geographical proximity (Schedl et al 2021;Way et al 2020). So, while we agree with the commentators that developing an understanding of aesthetic preferences in music is a high priority for musicality research, we do not expect it to be easy.…”
Section: R41 Musical Aestheticssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The recommendation engines 4 of the world's largest music streaming platforms often use minimal musical information in their attempts to predict whether a given user will enjoy listening to a particular song, instead modeling listener preferences using other information about the similarity of users, such as the particular clusters of songs or artists in common across users' playlists, regardless of musical content (Jacobson, Murali, Newett, Whitman, & Yon, 2016). This approach is consistent with experimental work demonstrating the value of social information in musical preferences (Salganik, Dodds, & Watts, 2006), and, in real-world Spotify data, the fact that musical preferences and microgenres are predictable from users' age, sex, language, and geographical proximity (Schedl, Bauer, Reisinger, Kowald, & Lex, 2021;Way, Garcia-Gathright, & Cramer, 2020). Therefore, although we agree with the commentators that developing an understanding of esthetic preferences in music is a high priority for musicality research, we do not expect it to be easy.…”
Section: R41 Musical Estheticssupporting
confidence: 54%