2010
DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181f2f45d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Listening Preference for the Native Language Compared to an Unfamiliar Language in Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Infants After Cochlear Implantation

Abstract: The findings of the present study are the first to show that hearing-impaired infants with CI bring the same perceptual biases to the task of language learning as NH infants. These have important implications on understanding the process by which infants with CI acquire language via the CI device.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This outcome measure is used clinically to track the development of auditory skills in relation to changes in audibility, such as prior to and after implantation, and is sensitive to the auditory development of the infant (Bagatto, Moodie, Seewald, Bartlett, & Scollie, 2011;McConkey Robbins, Burton Koch, Osberger, Zimmerman-Phillips, & Kishon-Rabin, 2004). It is used routinely in early intervention programs, and it has been used in the previous studies of IDS preference in children with hearing impairment (Kishon-Rabin et al, 2010;Segal & Kishon-Rabin, 2011). The mean IT-MAIS score was 65.9 (SD = 19.3) for infants with hearing impairment (see Table 2).…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This outcome measure is used clinically to track the development of auditory skills in relation to changes in audibility, such as prior to and after implantation, and is sensitive to the auditory development of the infant (Bagatto, Moodie, Seewald, Bartlett, & Scollie, 2011;McConkey Robbins, Burton Koch, Osberger, Zimmerman-Phillips, & Kishon-Rabin, 2004). It is used routinely in early intervention programs, and it has been used in the previous studies of IDS preference in children with hearing impairment (Kishon-Rabin et al, 2010;Segal & Kishon-Rabin, 2011). The mean IT-MAIS score was 65.9 (SD = 19.3) for infants with hearing impairment (see Table 2).…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Segal and Kishon-Rabin (2011) found that infants (aged 14–33 months) with profound hearing loss who use cochlear implants (CI) preferred listening to IDS over both white noise and time reversed speech. In a separate study, Kishon-Rabin et al (2010) demonstrated that infants who use CIs can differentiate exemplars of IDS in their native language (Hebrew) from exemplars of IDS in a non-native language (English). Although both of the studies by Kishon-Rabin and colleagues (Kishon-Rabin et al 2010; Segal & Kishon-Rabin 2011) established that CIs provide infants with profound hearing loss access to IDS, their studies did not address whether these infants show perceptual preferences for IDS relative to ADS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a separate study, Kishon-Rabin et al (2010) demonstrated that infants who use CIs can differentiate exemplars of IDS in their native language (Hebrew) from exemplars of IDS in a non-native language (English). Although both of the studies by Kishon-Rabin and colleagues (Kishon-Rabin et al 2010; Segal & Kishon-Rabin 2011) established that CIs provide infants with profound hearing loss access to IDS, their studies did not address whether these infants show perceptual preferences for IDS relative to ADS. In a recent study Robertson, et al, (2013) examined listening preference for IDS over ADS in a group of infants with HI (8.9 to 32.2 months) whose hearing age ranged from 5.1 to 11.5 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…At least one recent behavioral study indicated that when testing infants with 1–2 months of initial CI use, infants that ranged between 4 and 10 months of age preferred their native language (Hebrew) compared with English (Kishon-Rabin et al, 2010). This timeline mirrors that seen for normal-hearing infants and corroborates the view that, with very early intervention, tuning may not be impacted (at least at the behavioral level).…”
Section: Sensory Deprivation (Deafness) In Infants and Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%