2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Listening to a baby crying induces higher electroencephalographic synchronization among prefrontal, temporal and parietal cortices in adoptive mothers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reduction in EEG coherence between prefrontal and temporoparietal regions may reflect a relative loosening of executive control over the more posterior, predominantly perceptual areas. Research on individual differences in brain responses to affectively laden information has shown that decreased prefrontal-posterior coupling during social-emotional stimulation is related to greater influence of perceptual input on affective states 1927 . For example, individuals with high trait rumination exhibited decreased prefrontal-posterior coupling during negative emotional stimulation and the persistance of negative affect was related to the degree of prefrontal-posterior decoupling 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reduction in EEG coherence between prefrontal and temporoparietal regions may reflect a relative loosening of executive control over the more posterior, predominantly perceptual areas. Research on individual differences in brain responses to affectively laden information has shown that decreased prefrontal-posterior coupling during social-emotional stimulation is related to greater influence of perceptual input on affective states 1927 . For example, individuals with high trait rumination exhibited decreased prefrontal-posterior coupling during negative emotional stimulation and the persistance of negative affect was related to the degree of prefrontal-posterior decoupling 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, detailed observational comparisons of adoptive and nonadoptive mothers show both to be responsive, attentive, and respond effectively and contingently to their child's social and emotional clues (Suwalsky et al, 2008, 2012). These behavioral observations have been confirmed by EEG studies of biological and adoptive mothers responding to recordings of crying babies as well as pictures of babies; both groups of mothers were clearly different than nonmothers, suggesting brain functioning had been adapted to motherhood in adoptive mothers without the hormonal changes occasioned by birth and lactation (Perez‐Hernandez et al, 2017). However, one study did find very subtle differences in EEG frequencies that might reflect the absence of these hormonal changes, though the functional significance of these findings seems slight (Hernandez‐Gonzalez et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Adoptive Family: Is It a Model For Family Process In Bio...mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Parenting involves high frequency of social understanding combined with high importance of correctly interpreting social cues and therefore might serve as a training for social understanding. Studies comparing biological mothers with foster and adoptive mothers have found remarkable similarities in attention allocation (Grasso et al, 2009) and cortical synchronisation as measured with electroencephalography (Pérez-Hernández et al, 2017). This indicates that even without genetic relation, motherhood still leads to differences in social understanding lending further support for the possibility of training effects of motherhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%