2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-019-03898-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Listening to Radiation Damage In Situ: Passive and Active Acoustic Techniques

Abstract: Knowing when, why, and how materials evolve, degrade, or fail in radiation environments is pivotal to a wide range of fields from semiconductor processing to advanced nuclear reactor design. A variety of methods, including optical and electron microscopy, mechanical testing, and thermal techniques, have been used in the past to successfully monitor the microstructural and property evolution of materials exposed to extreme radiation environments. Acoustic techniques have also been used in the past for this purp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…112,113 Contactbased ultrasonic techniques have also been deployed in ion beam and other radiation environments to observe changes in elasticity and detect irradiationinduced events through acoustic emission, but applications of these methods have been narrow so far. 114,115 Before discussing each of these classes of experiments in turn, we note that by targeting performance characteristics directly, these methods all capture the integrated effects of defect accumulation and microstructure evolution across all defect sizes from the nanoscale to the microscale. While methods such as in situ microscopy must by nature be targeted at one primary length scale of interest (SEM vs. TEM for example), methods which capture material properties directly will integrate the effects of defects at all scales as long as the representative sampling volume remains larger than the scale of individual defects.…”
Section: In Situ Properties Characterization Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…112,113 Contactbased ultrasonic techniques have also been deployed in ion beam and other radiation environments to observe changes in elasticity and detect irradiationinduced events through acoustic emission, but applications of these methods have been narrow so far. 114,115 Before discussing each of these classes of experiments in turn, we note that by targeting performance characteristics directly, these methods all capture the integrated effects of defect accumulation and microstructure evolution across all defect sizes from the nanoscale to the microscale. While methods such as in situ microscopy must by nature be targeted at one primary length scale of interest (SEM vs. TEM for example), methods which capture material properties directly will integrate the effects of defects at all scales as long as the representative sampling volume remains larger than the scale of individual defects.…”
Section: In Situ Properties Characterization Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date, the most expansive use of in situ laser-based thermophysical property measurement techniques has come from the application of transient grating spectroscopy (TGS). 115,116,[119][120][121][122] All of these photothermal and photoacoustic methods fall into the category of pump-probe techniques where some form of laser excitation is provided to induce a response in the material in question. Following excitation, a probing laser detects the material response through physical displacement, the thermoreflectance effect, or some combination of both.…”
Section: In Situ Optical/infrared Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a nonselective resistance layer is formed when high irradiation is applied and decreases both in selectivity and permeability [70]. Generally, ion beam techniques include ion irradiation, ion implantation, and focus ion beam where the ion irradiation and the ion implantation involve ex-situ and alternatively, the focus ion beam involve in-situ modification [71]. They are all pure physical processes as none of them introduces any foreign species into the targeted polymeric membrane.…”
Section: Crosslinking Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, ethyl cellulose (EC), linear polyimide (LPI), hyperbranched polyimide (HBPI) and poly 2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide, and magnetic nanoparticles like ferroferric oxide (Fe2O3 and Fe3O4) or a permanent magnet like neodymium, praseodymium, ferrite, etc. are used to fabricate a smart polymer magnetic membrane [70][71][72][73]. The permeability of O2 highly depends on the magnetic field induction.…”
Section: Polymer Magnetic Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several in situ characterization techniques have been employed to characterize gas cavity behavior as a function of dose, time, or temperature, including elastic recoil detection, 24 positron annihilation spectroscopy, 25 TEM, 26,27 transient grating spectroscopy, 28,29 and acoustic emission. 29 We demonstrate the utility of in situ TEM ion implantation and annealing experiments for providing in situ time-dependent data on gas stabilized cavity evolution and growth in extreme environments and suggest how those data can motivate and aid validation of models that provide a mechanistic explanation for macroscopic physical phenomena. 30 In situ TEM He implantation has previously been performed on several pure metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%