Listening to the Boys: English boys' views on the desirable characteristics of teachers of sex education

Abstract

This paper explores the preferences of boys regarding the characteristics of teachers of sex education. Sex education in English schools is delivered as a compulsory part of National Curriculum Science and in most schools is further explored in time given over to personal, social and health education. Research was carried out in a variety of schools from both the state and private sectors, by the use of focus group interviews and questionnaires. Due to the existing law in England and Wales regarding parents' right of withdrawal from classes, only boys of 16 or over were used in this research. Boys want teachers to be empathetic, non-judgemental and able to create a 'safe environment' in order to facilitate the discussion of difficult subjects. Most boys believed that the age and sex of the teacher had little bearing on whether they could deliver the subject well; more important was their ability to generate trust, keep control of classes and use relaxed and informal methods of delivery. Unanimously the boys believed that history and English teachers were more able to fulfil these requirements whereas science and mathematics teachers were considered to be unable to adapt to the relaxed styles required. There was a general belief that teachers should be specially trained in this area of the curriculum. Disagreement was found in areas such as the use of outsiders to deliver sex education. The implications of this research for teacher educators, teachers in training and schools are considerable. Unless boys work with teachers they respect and trust they will continue to have little time for this area of the curriculum, to the detriment of their future relationships.

Learning about domestic violence: young people's responses to a Healthy Relationships programme

“…This finding is consistent with Hilton's (2003) research into boys' experience of sex education. Boys were particularly likely to value the dramatic and kinetic aspects of the programme and were less likely to value 'sitting and talking' (see also Hannan, 1996;Blake, 1997;Baker, 1998;Wood, 1998).…”

Predictors of Access to Sex Education for Children With Intellectual Disabilities in Public Schools

“…When data were obtained from general and special education teachers, they were averaged to produce a composite, as noted by Griffin, Taylor, Urbano, and Hodapp (2014). Finally, as previous literature has indicated that sex education is either taught or desired to he taught in the context of physical education (e.g., Darroch et al, 2000;Harrison & HiUier, 1999;Hilton, 2003), the variable of whether the student received physical education in the general education setting was included as a predictor in our analyses. ©AAIDD DOI: 10.1352DOI: 10.…”

Sex education in Northern Ireland schools: a critical evaluation

“…Complaints about the over-emphasis on biology and on sex as risk, as well as the denial of sexual pleasure, especially to girls, are also revealed by research on sex education in schools outside of Northern Ireland (for example , Fine, 1988;Allen, 2001;Hilton, 2001Hilton, , 2003Nilsson & Sandströ m, 2001;Atkinson, 2002;BayCheng, 2003). This raises the question of what, if anything, is unique about sex education in Northern Ireland, and how that uniqueness might be explained.…”