2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00326-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Listeria monocytogenes and listeriosis: a review of hazard characterisation for use in microbiological risk assessment of foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
180
0
22

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
180
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…L. monocytogenes infections are particularly dangerous to certain risk groups, including pregnant women, the elderly, newborns, and immunocompromised patients (Doyle et al 2001;Liu 2006). The manifestations of listeriosis include meningoencephalitis, septicemia, abortion, and a high fatality rate of 30% (Liu 2004;McLauchlin et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L. monocytogenes infections are particularly dangerous to certain risk groups, including pregnant women, the elderly, newborns, and immunocompromised patients (Doyle et al 2001;Liu 2006). The manifestations of listeriosis include meningoencephalitis, septicemia, abortion, and a high fatality rate of 30% (Liu 2004;McLauchlin et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…monocytogenes is a halophilic bacterium (it can survive in a sodium chloride concentration of up to 30%), therefore the addition of sodium chloride as a preservative does not ensure the product protection against bacteria of the genus Listeria (Hudson 1992;McLauchlin et al 2004). Other preservatives, which in theory could be successfully applied due to their high efficiency, such as chlorine dioxide or oxidative water (reduction of the L. monocytogenes count by 3 and 5 orders of magnitude), are not recommended due to the risk of carcinogenic chlorine formation (Dzwolak 2008).…”
Section: Selected Methods For L Monocytogenes Elimination From Food mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…monocytogenes is a well-recognized zoonotic pathogen but the zoonotic risk in this case was considered low as the majority (99%) of human infections are foodborne (Mead et al, 1999;Swaminathan & Gerner-Smidt, 2007). There have, however, been reports of cutaneous or ocular infection due to contact with infected animals (McLauchlin et al, 2004) and the farmer and his workers were made aware of potential risks. No human health issues were observed during this outbreak.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%