Listings of model input values for the modular, three-dimensional, finite-difference, ground-water flow model of the Tesugue aquifer system in northern New Mexico

Umari, Amjad M. J.

doi:10.3133/ofr8948

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

(3 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The data arrays needed to run the Hearne (1985) model using the McDonald and Harbaugh (1984) code are presented as a supplement to this report (Umari, 1989).…”

Section: Pu Rp Os E and Scopementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The computer data arrays necessary to run the modular code for the steady-state simulation are presented in Umari (1989).…”

Section: Steady-state Simulation Using the Modular Model Codementioning

confidence: 99%

“…"Future period" means 1981 to 2080. The data arrays required to run the modular program for the combined historical-future run are presented in listings 7 through 14 of the report on model input values by Umari (1989).…”

Section: Combined Historical and Future Simulations Using The Modularmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Conversion and comparison of the mathematical, three-dimensional, finite-difference, ground-water flow model to the modular, three-dimensional, finite-difference, ground-water flow model for the Tesuque aquifer system in northern New Mexico

Umari¹,

Szeliga²

1989

Open-File Report

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The mathematical, three-dimensional, finite-difference, groundwater flow model of the Tesuque aquifer system in northern New Mexico was converted to run using the U.S. Geological Survey's modular groundwater flow code. Results from the final versions of the predevelopment and 1947 to 2080 transient simulations of the two models are compared. A correlation coefficient of 0.9905 was obtained for the match in block-by-block constanthead fluxes and 0.9845 was obtained for the match in block-by-block headdependent fluxes for predevelopment conditions. There are, however, significant differences in at least two specific cases. In the first case, a difference is associated with the net loss from the Pojoaque River and its tributaries to the aquifer. The net loss by the river is given as 1.134 cubic feet per second using the original groundwater model, which is 38.1 percent less than the net loss by the river of 1.8319 cubic feet per second computed by the new model in this study. In the second case, the large difference is computed for the transient decline in the hydraulic head of a model block near Tesuque Pueblo. The hydraulic-head decline by 2080 is, using the original model, 249 feet, which is 14.7 percent less than the hydraulic head of 292 feet computed by this study. In general, the differences between the two sets of results are not large enough to lead to different.conclusions regarding the behavior of the system at steady state or when pumped.

show abstract

“…The data arrays needed to run the Hearne (1985) model using the McDonald and Harbaugh (1984) code are presented as a supplement to this report (Umari, 1989).…”

Section: Pu Rp Os E and Scopementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The computer data arrays necessary to run the modular code for the steady-state simulation are presented in Umari (1989).…”

Section: Steady-state Simulation Using the Modular Model Codementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Conversion and comparison of the mathematical, three-dimensional, finite-difference, ground-water flow model to the modular, three-dimensional, finite-difference, ground-water flow model for the Tesuque aquifer system in northern New Mexico

Umari¹,

Szeliga²

1989

Open-File Report

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Listings of model input values for the modular, three-dimensional, finite-difference, ground-water flow model of the Tesugue aquifer system in northern New Mexico

Cited by 1 publication

References 2 publications

Conversion and comparison of the mathematical, three-dimensional, finite-difference, ground-water flow model to the modular, three-dimensional, finite-difference, ground-water flow model for the Tesuque aquifer system in northern New Mexico

Conversion and comparison of the mathematical, three-dimensional, finite-difference, ground-water flow model to the modular, three-dimensional, finite-difference, ground-water flow model for the Tesuque aquifer system in northern New Mexico

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About