2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2303.13503
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LiteBIRD and CMB-S4 Sensitivities to Reheating in Plateau Models of Inflation

Abstract: We study the sensitivity of LiteBIRD and CMB-S4 to the reheating temperature and the inflaton coupling in three types of plateau-potential models of inflation, namely mutated hilltop inflation, radion gauge inflation, and α-attractor T models. We first study the relations between model parameters and CMB observables in all models analytically. We then perform Monte Carlo Markov Chain based forecasts to quantify the information gain on the reheating temperature, the inflaton coupling, and the scale of inflation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the capability of future Cosmic Microwave Background experiments to detect a tensorto-scalar ratio at the level of r = O(10 −3 -10 −4 ) while marginally improving the current constraints on the spectral tilt n s [1,3,4], it might become eventually possible to set bounds on the physics of heating [48,49]. Having this in mind, let us make use of the lattice-based relations (3.6) and (3.2) to determine the precise value of the inflationary observables in a specific quintessential-inflation scenario involving only gravitational particle production.…”
Section: Impact On Inflationary Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the capability of future Cosmic Microwave Background experiments to detect a tensorto-scalar ratio at the level of r = O(10 −3 -10 −4 ) while marginally improving the current constraints on the spectral tilt n s [1,3,4], it might become eventually possible to set bounds on the physics of heating [48,49]. Having this in mind, let us make use of the lattice-based relations (3.6) and (3.2) to determine the precise value of the inflationary observables in a specific quintessential-inflation scenario involving only gravitational particle production.…”
Section: Impact On Inflationary Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the JCAP01(2024)053 , hence during reheating, RD, and MD, its evolution can differ, as the steepness of the curve reveals. equation of state w rh ≡ w Φ (a < a rh ), the duration of reheating, as well as the reheating temperature [69,70,77]. In figure 8, we show the evolution of the comoving Hubble horizon (aH) −1 in different cosmological epochs.…”
Section: B3 Matching Reheating To Inflationary Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the physics of reheating of producing a thermal bath is still poorly understood. Therefore it is imperative to study post-inflationary physics more carefully to constraint inflation models [30][31][32][33]. In this work, we attempt to constrain α-attractor inflation model demanding that during preheating it does not produce many moduli particles.…”
Section: Jcap11(2023)095mentioning
confidence: 99%