2001
DOI: 10.1353/aad.2012.0536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Literacy Publications: American Annals of the Deaf 1996 to 2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas there are typically no distinctions with use of conventions (Marschark, Lang, & Albertini, 2002) in the writing of deaf and hearing students, there exist several lexical and syntactical differences (Gormely & Sarachan-Deily, 1987). Writing of deaf students can be characterized as having short sentences with simple verb forms, few subordinate clauses, and few conjoined independent clauses (Heider & Heider, 1941;Moores & Miller, 2001;Powers & Wigus;Yoshinaga-Itano, Snyder, & Mayberry, 1996). Vocabulary levels are lower in comparison to their hearing peers (Heefner & Shaw, 1996).…”
Section: Development Of Writing Skills Using Balanced Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas there are typically no distinctions with use of conventions (Marschark, Lang, & Albertini, 2002) in the writing of deaf and hearing students, there exist several lexical and syntactical differences (Gormely & Sarachan-Deily, 1987). Writing of deaf students can be characterized as having short sentences with simple verb forms, few subordinate clauses, and few conjoined independent clauses (Heider & Heider, 1941;Moores & Miller, 2001;Powers & Wigus;Yoshinaga-Itano, Snyder, & Mayberry, 1996). Vocabulary levels are lower in comparison to their hearing peers (Heefner & Shaw, 1996).…”
Section: Development Of Writing Skills Using Balanced Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%