2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00498.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Literacy: whose complex activity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps predictably, some researchers have raised a number of concerns with the implications of the reductionist nature of the SVR, alternative conceptions of D and LC, as well as its possible role as a model of classroom teaching (see e.g. Barrs et al ., ). In its defence, the SVR was not conceptualised as a model of teaching and learning per se , but rather as a macro‐model of specifically word‐level and broader cognitive‐linguistic capacities on reading comprehension (Kirby & Savage, ).…”
Section: The Simple View Of Readingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Perhaps predictably, some researchers have raised a number of concerns with the implications of the reductionist nature of the SVR, alternative conceptions of D and LC, as well as its possible role as a model of classroom teaching (see e.g. Barrs et al ., ). In its defence, the SVR was not conceptualised as a model of teaching and learning per se , but rather as a macro‐model of specifically word‐level and broader cognitive‐linguistic capacities on reading comprehension (Kirby & Savage, ).…”
Section: The Simple View Of Readingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such a critique assumes that reduction must be inherently wrong and implies that the researcher or researchers operate with a discernible naïveté concerning the phenomenon under investigation. In the call for papers on this topic (Barrs et al, 2007), the SVR was, perhaps predictably, criticised for being reductionist. The issue really is whether this reduction is useful or whether it misses so much about the essence of the phenomenon as to be useless or harmful.…”
Section: Science Reductionism and The Svrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barrs et al divide views of reading education into "simple" and "complex." 38 The simple view of reading is of a process of decoding and comprehension. The complex view reading is as "a complex transaction whereby reciprocity is subtly negotiated among text, context and reader."…”
Section: I T E R a C Y P R A C T I C E I N U K S C H O O L Smentioning
confidence: 99%