Literary Translation and its Limitations in the Wider Spectrum of Cross Cultural Communication

Abstract

This paper aims at exploring the issue of whether it is possible to treat translation simply as a strategy in which semantic equivalence between the source language and the target language is established, especially in the context of literary translation which involves socio cultural communication, understanding of register, role relations and attitudinal aspects of language. To what extent a translator can contribute in bridging the gap caused by culture and geography is a question of great concern, as all literary texts are deeply couched in the socially determined and historically grown matrix of a particular culture, which proves to be a major impediment in translation. For example, a culturally specific term in source language may not have the corresponding word in the target language and some words have great suggestiveness in certain contexts whereas some images hardly have equivalents in other languages. To authenticate this point, a few examples of Assamese proverbs and idioms are considered that are very much grounded in the Assamese cultural fabric. In addition to these proverbs, the lexical items used in Assamese traditional folk songs are considered, which can pose difficulties for literary translators.

Transposing Proper Names in Frank McCourt’s Memoir Angela’s Ashes from English into Maltese

“…When transposing the encountered proper names, cultural losses were unavoidable (Baker 1992;Dickins, Hervey et al 2002;Boase-Beier 2003, 2004a, 2004bArmstrong 2005;Sun 2007Sun , 2009Dutta 2009;Negro Alousque 2009). Firstly, there were instances when the social, semantic, historical and/or cultural intrinsic allusions, connectivity or identity of the individual proper name with the source-reader disappeared, leading to the overall description in the TT becoming less intense for the target-reader (Leppihalme 1997: 91).…”