2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chas.0c00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Literature Highlights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Too often, laboratory safety is viewed as a system based on compliance, rules, and regulations that are enforced with admonishment or punitive repercussions, when it should really be viewed through the lens of preventing harm to people and the environment. New initiatives from ACS Chemical Health & Safety such as Safety Highlights, 27 Literature Highlights, 28 and Community Highlights 29 are well poised to change this perception for all members of the chemical health and safety community, especially for researchers in academia. Ultimately, we strive to create a culture where people are not following safe practices because they are forced to, but rather that they see it as an imperative component of conducting researchthe first step of which, we believe, is to report on a new set of lessons learned from the development of a new paradigm of safety communication and researcher involvement.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Too often, laboratory safety is viewed as a system based on compliance, rules, and regulations that are enforced with admonishment or punitive repercussions, when it should really be viewed through the lens of preventing harm to people and the environment. New initiatives from ACS Chemical Health & Safety such as Safety Highlights, 27 Literature Highlights, 28 and Community Highlights 29 are well poised to change this perception for all members of the chemical health and safety community, especially for researchers in academia. Ultimately, we strive to create a culture where people are not following safe practices because they are forced to, but rather that they see it as an imperative component of conducting researchthe first step of which, we believe, is to report on a new set of lessons learned from the development of a new paradigm of safety communication and researcher involvement.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%