2015
DOI: 10.5121/ijdkp.2015.5501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Literature Review of Attribute Level and Structure Level Data Linkage Techniques

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R-squared measurement was previously mentioned in section 4.3. 8 and Table 9 we can conclude that the two proposed models outperformed the benchmark study as it gave 0.74 for Linear Regression which shows a significant increase in accuracy compared to 0.55 in the benchmark study and 0.82 for Random Forest regression which shows a reasonable increase in accuracy compared to 0.80 in benchmark study in terms of R-squared metric [38][39][40].…”
Section: Experimental Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…R-squared measurement was previously mentioned in section 4.3. 8 and Table 9 we can conclude that the two proposed models outperformed the benchmark study as it gave 0.74 for Linear Regression which shows a significant increase in accuracy compared to 0.55 in the benchmark study and 0.82 for Random Forest regression which shows a reasonable increase in accuracy compared to 0.80 in benchmark study in terms of R-squared metric [38][39][40].…”
Section: Experimental Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…A comparative evaluation of many contemporary work scheduling algorithms was offered by Anushree and Xavier [3]. The comparative study was proposed based on performance indicators, algorithm benefits, and algorithm drawbacks [30,31]. As a result of this research, they discovered that no single strategy can attain all of the essential parameters.…”
Section: Task Scheduling Evaluating Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most noteworthy works are developed by the type of attribute matching, also known as field matching, and structure level matching, used when the records need to be matched to more than one record. Attributes like linguistic similarity, rule expression, ranking, string distance, term frequency, range pattern, numeric distance, weight pattern, blocking, fuzzy matrix and path sequence are the most frequently used study approaches for record linkage by field matching (20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different data linkage approaches have been developed by researchers ( 5 , 8 , 1820 ) including but not limited to SQL Matching Strategies, exact matching strategies, and approximate matching strategies ( 21 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation