2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Literature review on evaluation and prediction methods of inland vessel manoeuvrability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where t i and t e respectively indicate the internal and external hull-interaction thrust deductions. Hence, (11) refines to:…”
Section: Propeller Characteristics Thrust Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where t i and t e respectively indicate the internal and external hull-interaction thrust deductions. Hence, (11) refines to:…”
Section: Propeller Characteristics Thrust Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, inland vessels tend to have one or more propellers, regularly ducted to protect them and to increase their performance, which are often placed in conjunction with multiple rudders to boost their manoeuvrability. Occasionally, the addition of an azimuth or bow thruster further improves their manoeuvrability [10,11]. In comparison, conventional marine vessels have propeller(s)-rudder(s) configurations positioned at the stern [12], and some marine vessels do carry more exotic propulsion systems such as transversal thrusters, azimuth thrusters, podded propellers, contra-rotating propellers, or even water jets for high speed vessels [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External factors that affect the maneuverability of the ships are: shallow waters, winds, currents, waves, marine vehicles, and land structures. Internal factors are; ship speed, vessel structure, propeller, and rudder systems [19].…”
Section: Bridge Operations Risks and Root Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied CFD identification approach was chosen for three reasons: (i) No towing tank scale model is available of the CEMT I vessel and real scale experiments would have been too expensive, hence currently eliminating the EFD approach for research activities; (ii) The prism shape of the CEMT I vessels differs significantly from most, more hydrodynamical designed, sea vessels. This difference makes the empiric formulae for the hydrodynamic coefficients of sea vessels not advisable, as the dimensions of the inland vessels would be out of bounds of these regression formulae [12]; (iii) Additionally, regression formulae for bigger inland vessels are scarce [10] and often do not scale well due to their other dimensional relationships between length, breadth, and width compared to the CEMT I vessel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%