“…Clinical and quality were performed based on the following criteria: Surveys related to the patient's grade of satisfaction (about resulting tip projection, softness, and volume contours, availability to undergo the procedure again, to recommend the treatment to friends, sufficient information about risks and complications [range 1-6: excellent (1); very good (2); good (3); sufficient (4); poor (5); and very poor (6)]) (Appendix A, available as Supplementary Material online, http://links.lww. com/SCS/D139); Clinical evaluation based on physician global assessment score (excellent, good, discreet, enough, poor, and inadequate); Clinical evaluation based on patient global assessment score (excellent, good, discreet, enough, poor, and inadequate); Visual analog scale (range 1-6: excellent [1]; very good [2]; good [3]; sufficient [4]; poor [5]; and very poor [6]); Factors/variables, as asymmetries, deformities, thickness, itching, and pain (presence or absence); Adverse effects signaling (did not occur).…”