“…It has become more and more difficult for conventional Li-ion battery technologies based on a liquid or gel electrolyte to meet the ever-increasing societal demand. , Solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) made by ion-conducting ceramics hold great promise for the next-generation Li battery technologies with better safety and higher energy density. − A range of ceramic SSEs, such as perovskite-type Li 3 x La 2/3– x TiO 3 , NASICON-type Li 1.3 Al 0.3 Ti 1.7 (PO 4 ) 3 , and Li 1+ x Al x Ge 2– x (PO 4 ) 3 , and garnet-type Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) and its derivatives have been studied owing to their appealing ionic conductivity (up to 10 –3 S cm –1 ), wide electrochemical window (up to 6 V), good chemical stability against Li metal, and excellent mechanical properties (up to 20 GPa). − However, their application in all-solid-state batteries has been hindered by the presence of voids, gaps, and pinholes upon sintering, as these defects are vulnerable spots for the penetration of Li dendrites, leading to thermal runaway, fire, and even explosion. − This problem is particularly acute when operating cells at medium to high current densities and long durations, making the ceramic SSEs incapable of realizing their high promise. , Among intensive efforts to address such an issue, sintering SSEs with inorganic fillers and sintering aids such as Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , MgO, CaO, BaO, LiF, LiCl, Li 3 BO 3 , Li 3 PO 4 , and BN has proven a viable solution to increase density and block the dendrite penetration. − However, many promising fillers and sintering aids were previously excluded due to their susceptibility of decomposition and sublimation during the prolonged heating of conventional sintering methods. − …”