2003
DOI: 10.1002/adma.200306125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithium Storage in Ordered Mesoporous Carbon (CMK‐3) with High Reversible Specific Energy Capacity and Good Cycling Performance

Abstract: Carbonaceous materials with high specific energy capacity are prime candidates for applications in rechargeable lithium batteries. The authors report the synthesis and characterization of ordered mesoporous carbon (CMK‐3), synthesized using ordered silica as a template, with high reversible specific capacity and good charge–discharge cycle characteristics. The performance of CMK‐3 is compared with that of carbon nanotubes, and its superiority is suggested to be related to the three‐dimensional ordered structur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
396
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 580 publications
(409 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
11
396
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The third cycle efficiency is 89% and, thereafter, remains above 97% up to 20 cycles. The average capacity loss "c" over a period of "n" number of cycles can be calculated as 12,13 where C n and C 1 are the specific capacities in the n th and first cycles, respectively. The average capacity loss in 20 cycles for the CMTs during the charge process is 1.3%, which is one of the lowest in carbon-based electrodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The third cycle efficiency is 89% and, thereafter, remains above 97% up to 20 cycles. The average capacity loss "c" over a period of "n" number of cycles can be calculated as 12,13 where C n and C 1 are the specific capacities in the n th and first cycles, respectively. The average capacity loss in 20 cycles for the CMTs during the charge process is 1.3%, which is one of the lowest in carbon-based electrodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hard carbons 4,5 and disordered carbons, 6 on the other hand, show a higher theoretical capacity than graphite of up to LiC 2 , due to the turbostatic disorder in the graphene sheets, but have a limited rate capability. To overcome these problems, single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs and MWCNTs), [7][8][9] carbon nanofibers (CNFs), 10 and porous carbon materials 11,12 have been studied as possible anode materials for Li-ion batteries. Their nanoscale dimensions provide a higher surface area-to-volume ratio, allowing higher Li ion intercalation, thus increasing the material specific capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,[35][36][37][38] As demonstrated by Zhou et al 39 large and ordered pore arrays are very beneficial to the intercalation of lithium, which is known as a slow bulk-phase reaction. The hierarchical structure of our Fe/Fe 3 O 4 /N-carbon composite is readily accessed by the electrolyte solution, that is Li + ions can freely move into large pores and intercalate into the thin pore walls and the N-loading location.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the initial efficiency (IE) of OMC anodes remained almost constant (approximately 30%) irrespective of the OMC preparation methods. 2,13,14 The IE of our TM materials (45-57%) was higher than the pure OMC, which should be related with the embedded MoO 2 nanophases. As listed in Table 1, increase of IE was attributed to decrease of surface area and increase of MoO 2 fraction because electrolyte decomposition on carbon surface can be major irreversible reaction during initial charging.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 As listed in Table 1, the discharge capacity (C dis ) of TM-0.5, 1, 2 and 3 electrodes was 581, 512, 514 and 571 mAh g ). For TM-1 and 2 anodes, decrease of C dis was probably due to co-effect originated from reduction of Li + storage sites within carbon induced by the surface area decrease and capacity rise in TM-3 was attributed to MoO 2 fraction increase.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%