Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
A number of different criteria for recognizing glacialmarine deposits and for distinguishing them from other glacial and nonglacial deposits exist. These are outlined in this paper. Unfortunately, most investigations of inferred glacial-marine sequences have relied on only a few of these criteria, and the criteria used vary with different investigators. Also, some major misconceptions about glacial-marine sedimentation exist; these are the result of our poor understanding of modern glacial-marine environments. As a result, there is dispute over the origin of many diamictite-and/or lonestone-bearing sequences. This paper attempts to define the spatial and temporal distribution of glacial-marine deposits. The objective was to stress the importance of these deposits by the nature of their great spatial and temporal distribution. This has been a difficult task, again, because there is seldom any good consensus as to the origin of diamictites and pebbly mudstones. Glacial-marine deposits are surely widespread, both in time and space, but the very controversy that stems over their interpretation is an equally important point in stressing that high latitude seas are perhaps the most complex and poorly understood sedimentary environment on earth.3
A number of different criteria for recognizing glacialmarine deposits and for distinguishing them from other glacial and nonglacial deposits exist. These are outlined in this paper. Unfortunately, most investigations of inferred glacial-marine sequences have relied on only a few of these criteria, and the criteria used vary with different investigators. Also, some major misconceptions about glacial-marine sedimentation exist; these are the result of our poor understanding of modern glacial-marine environments. As a result, there is dispute over the origin of many diamictite-and/or lonestone-bearing sequences. This paper attempts to define the spatial and temporal distribution of glacial-marine deposits. The objective was to stress the importance of these deposits by the nature of their great spatial and temporal distribution. This has been a difficult task, again, because there is seldom any good consensus as to the origin of diamictites and pebbly mudstones. Glacial-marine deposits are surely widespread, both in time and space, but the very controversy that stems over their interpretation is an equally important point in stressing that high latitude seas are perhaps the most complex and poorly understood sedimentary environment on earth.3
A time‐lapse movie of the seabed at 710 m in the Florida Straits shows an irregular sequence of sediment ripple migration and suspension events, occupying 17% of the 43‐day duration of the record. Sediment in the region is a moderately sorted carbonate medium sand. Simultaneous current meter records at various positions in and above the benthic boundary layer are compared in various ways with the movie record to develop reliable predictive criteria for sediment motions in situ. With initiation and termination of sediment ripple migration predicted to occur when mean current at 3‐m elevation is 24 and 22 cm/s, respectively, 96% of the record is correctly predicted.
An analysis of microborings within sediment and hardground samples collected from the Northwest Providence Channel and the western margin of the Little Bahama Bank was conducted to characterize the endolithic assemblage present, to examine the role of microboring organisms in the alteration of deep‐sea carbonates, and to evaluate the palaeoecologic potential of the aphotic microboring assemblage found. Samples examined in this study were collected at depths ranging from 210 to 1450 m. The microboring assemblage was found to contain: (a) filamentous fungal borings of five distinct types, (b) a 1.0 × 2.5 μm vermicular form of fungal or bacterial origin, (c) an 8‐12 μm tubular, branching form of probably fungal origin, (d) a subapically branched form considered to be fungal, (e) a spinate form of uncertain affinity and (f) sponge borings. Three of these forms are known only from the deep‐marine environment; the remainder are also known from shallow‐marine sediments found well within the photic zone. Both carbonate sediments and lithified hardgrounds are highly altered through the activity of endolithic organisms. Infestation of individual skeletal fragments by microborers may be so extensive as to produce heavily bored envelopes resembling those previously reported to occur only under shallow‐marine conditions. Although the geological ranges of these microborings remain to be established, the presence of such an aphotic assemblage, coupled with the absence of photosynthetic algal borings, could provide a valuable tool in palaeoecological studies. Other potential applications include the determination of turbidite sediment sources and the establishment of relative water depths for the formation of hardground surfaces.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.