2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithological controls on light penetration into rock surfaces – Implications for OSL and IRSL surface exposure dating

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). None of the profiles show disturbances such as have been attributed to opaque minerals by Meyer et al (2018). This is not suprising as no significant change in lithology could be found in between the slices of the different cores (Figs.…”
Section: Luminescence-depth Profilesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…2). None of the profiles show disturbances such as have been attributed to opaque minerals by Meyer et al (2018). This is not suprising as no significant change in lithology could be found in between the slices of the different cores (Figs.…”
Section: Luminescence-depth Profilesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…eralic aliquots used for dating. Additional signal scatter for our samples may be introduced by spatial variations of light penetration that is caused by heterogeneities in the rock mineralogy (Meyer et al, 2018) and core-to-core variations of OSL signal resetting (Sellwood et al, 2019). Previous studies demonstrated that lithologies with brighter quartz signals in polymineralic samples (e.g.…”
Section: Performance Of Osl Surface Exposure Dating On Calcarenite Bomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes the second slice had a lower equivalent dose than the first slice. This is counter-intuitive but can be explained by the fact that light will take the path of least resistance, and if some materials which are hard for light to penetrate are on the surface, the light will more easily go around it and under it (Meyer et al., 2018). Also, the first slice is less flat, following the contour of the original surface, and that may affect the luminescence.…”
Section: Equivalent Dose (De)mentioning
confidence: 99%