2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithology and mineralogy recognition from geochemical logging tool data using multivariate statistical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1997) or Konaté et al. (2017) was not possible. Consequently, we chose a rather simple approach and formed trend curves (TCs) from logs with similar deviation for rock classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1997) or Konaté et al. (2017) was not possible. Consequently, we chose a rather simple approach and formed trend curves (TCs) from logs with similar deviation for rock classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results of core-log correlation at the pilot hole allowed to define a detailed lithological column for the nearly un-cored main hole and to estimate the physical properties. A similar approach was used in the Continental Scientific Drilling Program in the Sulu-Dabie ultra-high pressure terrane, where Konaté et al (2017) applied cross plot and principal component analysis to various dry weight percent oxide concentration logs to characterize the lithology and derive the mineralogy. Their method allowed them to determine the different characteristics of eclogite, orthogneiss, amphibolite, and paragneiss.…”
Section: Log-core Correlation and Its Relevance For Lithological Clasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This procedure includes two processes: raising dimensions to get nonlinear information and reducing dimensions to get classification features. Cross plots and Principal Component Analysis were used to lithology characterization and mineralogy description from geochem-ical logging tool data [10]. In [6], five machine learning methods were employed to classify the formation lithology identification using well log data samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%