2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015gl066950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithospheric records of orogeny within the continental U.S.

Abstract: In order to better understand the tectonic evolution of the North American continent, we utilize data from the EarthScope Transportable Array network to calculate a three‐dimensional shear velocity model for the continental United States. This model was produced through the inversion of Rayleigh wave phase velocities calculated using ambient noise tomography and wave gradiometry, which allows for sensitivity to a broad depth range. Shear velocities within this model highlight the influence of orogenic and post… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
86
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(92 reference statements)
11
86
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Some models (Schmandt et al, 2015;Shen & Ritzwoller, 2016) are relatively fast through the lithospheric column and do not necessarily require invoking grain size effects. The model of Porter et al (2016) generally matches our MT-based temperatures inferences with grain sizes of~10 cm; although slightly larger than typically assumed for the mantle, we nevertheless take this as evidence that anelasticity can indeed reconcile the seemingly disparate MT and seismic results. The model of Wagner et al (2018) is consistent at all depths when taking into account grain sizes of 1 mm to 10 cm.…”
Section: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystemssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Some models (Schmandt et al, 2015;Shen & Ritzwoller, 2016) are relatively fast through the lithospheric column and do not necessarily require invoking grain size effects. The model of Porter et al (2016) generally matches our MT-based temperatures inferences with grain sizes of~10 cm; although slightly larger than typically assumed for the mantle, we nevertheless take this as evidence that anelasticity can indeed reconcile the seemingly disparate MT and seismic results. The model of Wagner et al (2018) is consistent at all depths when taking into account grain sizes of 1 mm to 10 cm.…”
Section: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystemssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Resistive upper mantle beneath the SEUS also appears in the global geomagnetic depth sounding (GDS) results of Sun et al (2015). (Pollitz & Mooney, 2016;Porter et al, 2016;Schmandt et al, 2015;Shen & Ritzwoller, 2016;Wagner et al, 2018) and geometric mean resistivity (Murphy & Egbert, 2017) over the same depth range. (Pollitz & Mooney, 2016;Porter et al, 2016;Schmandt et al, 2015;Shen & Ritzwoller, 2016;Wagner et al, 2018) and geometric mean resistivity (Murphy & Egbert, 2017) over the same depth range.…”
Section: Previous Mt Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The eastern North American coast is the site of significant seismic velocity heterogeneities [Levin et al, 1995;Levin et al, 2000;Li et al, 2003;Godey et al, 2004;Nettles and Dziewonski, 2008;Chu et al, 2013;Schmandt and Lin, 2014;Skryzalin et al, 2015;Pollitz and Mooney, 2016;Porter et al, 2016]. They are a record-albeit an ambiguous one-of lithospheric and asthenospheric processes operating at the continental margin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%