2003
DOI: 10.1890/02-5187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Litter Invertebrate Responses to Variable Density Thinning in Western Washington Forest

Abstract: We evaluated the response of forest floor invertebrates to variable density thinning (VDT) of the Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) forest overstory at Ft. Lewis, Washington, during 2000 and 2001 (7-8 years post-thinning). We placed pitfall traps at 8-12 random grid points in each of four thinned units and four control (unthinned) units in each of two sites (blocks) representing different management histories. Most taxa showed significant seasonal trends, with peak abundances during summer. AN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Arthropods are good bioindicators of ecosystem change and habitat modification due to their small body size, short generation time (Kremen et al, 1993), high sensitivity to temperature and moisture changes (Schowalter et al, 2003), and provision of ecosystem services (Longcore, 2003). These characteristics make arthropods suitable indicators of the integrity of forest management practices (Samways, 1994;New, 1995New, , 1998Progar and Schowalter, 2002;Maleque et al, 2006a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arthropods are good bioindicators of ecosystem change and habitat modification due to their small body size, short generation time (Kremen et al, 1993), high sensitivity to temperature and moisture changes (Schowalter et al, 2003), and provision of ecosystem services (Longcore, 2003). These characteristics make arthropods suitable indicators of the integrity of forest management practices (Samways, 1994;New, 1995New, , 1998Progar and Schowalter, 2002;Maleque et al, 2006a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data may be calculated from tallies of total individuals or from simple presence-absence (incidence) observations. It is common in the myrmecological literature for tallies of total individuals captured to be used to derive relative abundance data Bestelmeyer et al 2000;Parr and Chown 2001;Wang et al 2001b;Schowalter et al 2003;Borgelt and New 2005;Dunn et al 2007). The natural history of ant species and the manner in which they are distributed in the environment, however, should make myrmecologists wary of this approach.…”
Section: Relative Abundance and The Spatial Distribution O/formica Obmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-response permutation procedures (MRPP) were conducted with the software PC-ORD, a nonparametric protocol for testing the null hypothesis of no differences among groups of thinning treatments in the data matrix. MRPP is useful when analyzing ecological data because it does not require assumptions of normality and constant variance (Biondini et al, 1988;McCune and Mefford, 1999;McCune and Grace, 2002;Schowalter et al, 2003). Values for indicator species were calculated according to the method of Dufr6ne and Legendre (1997) -this is a simple, intuitive solution for identifying which species may serve as an indicator(s) of a particular environmental condition.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%