1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00247-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Litterfall and nitrogen-use efficiency of plantations and primary forest in the eastern Brazilian Amazon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
32
2
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
14
32
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…v. pallaciana (1.3 Mg C ha -1 year -1 ), but the contribution of no-needle litterfall was surprisingly low (less than 5%). Thus, upon the scarce information of genus Pinus in Mediterranean areas, litterfall rates seems to be in a range between 1.5-2 Mg C ha -1 , (with our data fitting in this threshold) far away from values of 3 Mg C ha -1 year -1 found in semi-arid areas (Pérez-Suárez et al, 2009) or up to 5 Mg C ha -1 year -1 in tropical areas (Smith et al, 1998). Regarding oak litterfall rates, information is even more limited.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…v. pallaciana (1.3 Mg C ha -1 year -1 ), but the contribution of no-needle litterfall was surprisingly low (less than 5%). Thus, upon the scarce information of genus Pinus in Mediterranean areas, litterfall rates seems to be in a range between 1.5-2 Mg C ha -1 , (with our data fitting in this threshold) far away from values of 3 Mg C ha -1 year -1 found in semi-arid areas (Pérez-Suárez et al, 2009) or up to 5 Mg C ha -1 year -1 in tropical areas (Smith et al, 1998). Regarding oak litterfall rates, information is even more limited.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Although data were limited to one area in the basin, it is important to note that litterfall deposition was of the same order as those reported in many other studies in the Amazonian region. 30,40,41 The Hg concentrations in the litter were also on the same order than those reported by Mélières et al 30 (64 ng g -1…”
Section: Soil and Soil Cover Roles In The Mercury Cyclesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Assuming this soil flux leads to an average within-canopy daytime NO 2 concentration of 0.40-2.00 ppbv, average leaf NO 2 uptake and emission rates would be 13.56 and 3.63 pmol m -2 s -1 , respectively (Table 2). Multiplying these uptake rates by a range of reported LAI values (Jipp et al 1998;Larcher 1995;Smith et al 1998), the canopy is estimated to assimilate and emit 11.5-19.6 and 12.2-19.5% of the soil-emitted NO as NO 2 , respectively, dependent on LAI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the central role that NO 2 plays in the regulation of tropospheric O 3 formation, high priority should be given to elucidating the magnitude of canopy NO 2 uptake in a variety of ecosystems and the significance of such uptake to inventories of soil NO y emissions to the atmosphere. (Bakwin et al 1990), leaf area index (LAI) (Jipp et al 1998;Larcher 1995;Smith et al 1998) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%