2004
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2004040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Litterfall, nutrient return, and leaf-litter decomposition in four plantations compared with a natural forest in subtropical China

Abstract: -The amount and pattern of litterfall, its nutrient return, initial chemistry of leaf litter, and dynamics of N, P and K associated with leaf-litter decomposition were studied in 33-year-old plantations of two coniferous trees, Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata, CF) and Fokienia hodginsii (FH), and two broadleaved trees, Ormosia xylocarpa (OX) and Castanopsis kawakamii (CK), and compared with that of an adjacent natural forest of Castanopsis kawakamii (NF, ~150 year old) in Sanming, Fujian, China. Mean annu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(69 reference statements)
6
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Trap contents were collected at 15-day intervals between December 21, 2006, andDecember 20, 2007. Since area and height above the ground of litter traps as well as the sampling period of collection in litterfall studies are variable, which in many circumstances depends on the total area sampled, type of vegetation, the temporal and spatial variation in litterfall production, and to prevent significant decomposition and leaching loss of nutrients by throughfall between collections resulting in an underestimation of the true litterfall flux of nutrients to the forest soil, in this study, the area of sampling, number of traps and height above soil level, and litter collection period are within the range of previous studies (Ukonmaanaho and Starr 2001;Finotti et al 2003;Read and Lawrence 2003;Yang et al 2004Yang et al , 2006Fang et al 2007;Zhou et al 2007). Litter contents were manually sorted into the following categories: leaves, reproductive structures (flowers, fruits, and seeds) twigs or branches (\2 cm in diameter), and miscellaneous residues (unidentified, fine plant tissue such as bark, pieces of insect bodies or feces).…”
Section: Collections Of Litterfall Productionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Trap contents were collected at 15-day intervals between December 21, 2006, andDecember 20, 2007. Since area and height above the ground of litter traps as well as the sampling period of collection in litterfall studies are variable, which in many circumstances depends on the total area sampled, type of vegetation, the temporal and spatial variation in litterfall production, and to prevent significant decomposition and leaching loss of nutrients by throughfall between collections resulting in an underestimation of the true litterfall flux of nutrients to the forest soil, in this study, the area of sampling, number of traps and height above soil level, and litter collection period are within the range of previous studies (Ukonmaanaho and Starr 2001;Finotti et al 2003;Read and Lawrence 2003;Yang et al 2004Yang et al , 2006Fang et al 2007;Zhou et al 2007). Litter contents were manually sorted into the following categories: leaves, reproductive structures (flowers, fruits, and seeds) twigs or branches (\2 cm in diameter), and miscellaneous residues (unidentified, fine plant tissue such as bark, pieces of insect bodies or feces).…”
Section: Collections Of Litterfall Productionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The changes in the carbon stocks of the soils in the different forest types might also reflect the differences in quantity and quality of above-and below-ground litter inputs, litter carbon decay (Mo et al, 2002), and root biomass carbon. Yang et al (2004c) noted that the leaf-litter of Chinese fir possesses higher lignin concentration and lignin/N ratio than that of broad leaf tree. In addition, broadleaved trees may allocate more biomass to their roots, especially the fine roots at the shallow soil horizons, which can fix a greater amount of carbon and transfer more root detritus to the top soil (Yang et al, 2004a(Yang et al, , 2004b.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IV). Yang et al [51] also noted that leaf-litters of the NF and the broadleaveds were characterized by lower lignin content and narrower lignin/N ratio than those of the conifers. Further, the higher concentration of fine roots in the topsoil in the NF than in the plantations can transfer much more root detritus from roots to superficial soils [49].…”
Section: Detritus Carbon Poolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen 0.5 m × 1.0 m litter traps made of nylon mesh (1 mm mesh size), were arranged in each forest and were raised 25 cm above the ground, and the litterfall was collected at 10-day intervals from January 1999 to December 2001 [51]. The collected litter at each time was oven-dried at 80 °C to constant weight.…”
Section: Aboveground Litterfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation