2018
DOI: 10.1017/nmj.2018.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Littlewood–paley Characterizations of Anisotropic Weak Musielak–orlicz Hardy Spaces

Abstract: Let $A$ be an expansive dilation on $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\times [0,\infty )\rightarrow [0,\infty )$ an anisotropic growth function. In this article, the authors introduce the anisotropic weak Musielak–Orlicz Hardy space $\mathit{WH}_{A}^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ via the nontangential grand maximal function and then obtain its Littlewood–Paley characterizations in terms of the anisotropic Lusin-area function, $g$-function or $g_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}}^{\ast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By (12), we find that β k, l i is an anisotropic (ϕ, q, s)-atom and a k, l i = λ k i µ k, l i β k, l i . Then, by the argument same as (3.13) in the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [31] with (f k i ) * m being replaced by (a k, l i ) * m and Definition 2.5(ii), we have, for any…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…By (12), we find that β k, l i is an anisotropic (ϕ, q, s)-atom and a k, l i = λ k i µ k, l i β k, l i . Then, by the argument same as (3.13) in the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [31] with (f k i ) * m being replaced by (a k, l i ) * m and Definition 2.5(ii), we have, for any…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%