Abstract:Based on these data, the risk of multiple births from IVF varies by maternal age and number of embryos transferred. Embryo quality was not related to multiple birth risk but was associated with increased live-birth rates when fewer embryos were transferred.
“…In 2005, 35.0% of all births in the US resulting from IVF-ET were multiples, a rate 10 times higher than 3% in general population. 6 Women with IVF-conceived singletons are at increased risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, placenta praevia, and perinatal mortality. ART singleton pregnancies also have higher relative risks of having induction of labor and Cesarean section (CS), both emergency and elective.…”
“…In 2005, 35.0% of all births in the US resulting from IVF-ET were multiples, a rate 10 times higher than 3% in general population. 6 Women with IVF-conceived singletons are at increased risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, placenta praevia, and perinatal mortality. ART singleton pregnancies also have higher relative risks of having induction of labor and Cesarean section (CS), both emergency and elective.…”
“…A focus of the debate has been to reduce multiple births, with the current focus on one embryo transfer to eliminate twin births (1)(2)(3)(4). Studies on the physical health of the IVF-treated mother and the child during pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal period shows high rates of cesarean section, premature births, children small for gestational age, and an increased risk for congenital malformations (2)(3)(4)(5). The interpretation of these results show that the high frequency of multiple births and maternal age were the contributing factors; not the IVF technique itself.…”
Selling, Relationship and parenthood in IVF couples with twin and singleton pregnancies compared with pontaneous singleton primiparous couples-a prospective 5-year follow-up study, 2008, Fertility and Sterility, (89), 3, 578-585. http://dx
“…Finally, discordance among blastomeres from the same embryo appears to present a significant problem in interpreting results and renders PGS for aneuploidy ineffective [48]. Large studies have shown that among women undergoing IVF, the chances of a live birth are related to the number of eggs fertilized, presumably because of the greater selection of embryos for transfer [49,50]. The fact that the embryo biopsy inevitably reduces the cohort of normal embryos available for transfer may actually Fig.…”
Purpose To assess the efficacy of preimplantation genetic screening to increase ongoing pregnancy rates in couples without known genetic disorders. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility and extracted data. Results Ten randomized trials (1,512 women) were included. The quality of evidence was moderate. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model suggest that PGS has a lower rate of ongoing pregnancies (risk ratio=0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.87) and a lower rate of live births (risk ratio=0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.91) than standard in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Conclusions In women with poor prognosis or in general in vitro fertilization program, in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy does not increase but instead was associated with lower rates of ongoing pregnancies and live births. The use of preimplantation genetic screening in daily practice does not appear to be justified.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.