Liveable streets in Hanoi: A principal component analysis

Sanders, Peter; Zuidgeest, Mark; Geurs, Karst

doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.07.001

Cited by 29 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Patarasuk [8] analysed the road network connectivity and land-cover dynamics in Lop Buri province, Thailand [8]. Soesanti and Nakai [54] examined the SNs in Bandung City, Indonesia, whereas Sanders et al [55] assessed the liveable streets in Hanoi, Vietnam and Henderson [32] measured Singaporean walkable streets for tourists [56]. Other studies have concentrated on energy, traffic accidents [18], urban forms [57], flooding [23], and paratransit [33].…”

Section: Contribution To the Literature On Transport In The Ascnmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Urban Drivable and Walkable Street Networks of the ASEAN Smart Cities Network

Zhao

Yen

Bailey

et al. 2019

IJGI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Making transport systems sustainable is a topic that has attracted the attention of many researchers and urban planners. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Smart Cities Network (ASCN) was initiated to develop a sustainable transport system in the ASEAN countries. A comprehensive understanding of street networks (SNs) can contribute significantly to the achievement of this initiative. Therefore, this paper measured and compared characteristics of drivable street networks (DSNs) and walkable street networks (WSNs) of the 26 ASCN pilot cities by applying multiple network metrics. The OSMnx tool was used to download and analyse WSNs and DSNs from the OpenStreetMap. The findings present the topological and geometric characteristics of WSNs and DSNs that are diverse and characterized by different factors. The cities with orthogonal street grids, high street density, intersection density, and fewer cul-de-sacs have good accessibility to reach destinations. In contrast, some other cities have more curvilinear and circuitous SNs with many missing links to other streets, which in turn are prone to traffic disruption. The study highlights the important features of SNs that have significant implications for future designs of SNs in the ASCN whose goal is to make cities smart and liveable for ASEAN members.

show abstract

Section: Contribution To the Literature On Transport In The Ascnmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Urban Drivable and Walkable Street Networks of the ASEAN Smart Cities Network

Zhao

Yen

Bailey

et al. 2019

IJGI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sanders et al (2015) identified that about 60% of the study respondents are dissonants because of heavy traffic volume in their currently living streets and their preference to live in a quiet street in Hanoi. This study has not further investigated the impacts of dissonance on travel behaviour due to its different focus.…”

Section: Residential Dissonance and Travel Behaviourmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determinants of residential dissonance: Implications for transit-oriented development in Brisbane

Kamruzzaman

Baker

Washington

et al. 2016

International Journal of Sustainable Transportation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Residential dissonance is the mismatch of land use patterns between individuals' actual and preferred neighbourhood type. It is a threat to land use based policy interventions, such as transit oriented development (TOD), aiming to enhance sustainable mobility behaviour. Dissonants in TOD are more likely to use the car and less likely to use public transport. They do not naturally adjust their preferences according to their surrounding land use patterns and continue their predisposition travel behaviour. Therefore, it is critical to identify dissonant groups to inform policy development to lessen the level of dissonance in TODs. This research identifies groups that are more likely to be dissonant in TOD/non-TOD areas in Brisbane. The living conditions of 6271 individuals were Downloaded by [La Trobe University] at 09:45 31 May 2016 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2 classified into TOD or non-TOD types based on a cluster analysis of built environmentalfactors. Individuals" preferred neighbourhoods were also categorised into TOD and non-TOD types based on a factor analysis of travel attitudes and preferences. Four unique groups were identified (dissonants and consonants in both TOD and non-TOD areas) when respondents" actual and preferred neighbourhood types were combined. Binary logistic regression analyses were employed to identify the determinants of residential dissonance in TOD/non-TOD areas. The results indicate that 30% of the respondents living in TOD areas are dissonants. Being male, having car availability at all times, and individuals with poor health condition were more likely to be dissonants in TOD areas in Brisbane.

show abstract

“…crime rates; security measures (CCTV cameras, etc. ); presence of police and street wardens; facades with windows to the street; children playing; graffiti; perceived safety from crime; Appleyard and Cox, 2016;Carmona, 2014;Ewing and Clemente, 2013;Gehl, 1987;Hillier, 2004;Jacobs, 1961;Llewelyn-Davis, 2000;Park and Garcia, 2019;Sanders et Appleyard and Lintell, 1972;Carmona, 2014;Cha et al, 2014;Ewing and Clemente, 2013;Friedmann, 2007;Gehl, 1987;McAndrews and Marshall, 2018;Montgomery, 1998;Orum et…”

Section: Sense Of Placementioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, no comprehensive framework of liveable streets has been identified in the literature. At first, Appleyard and Lintell (1972) formulated five indicators to assess liveable streets, which were further expanded in other studies (Bosselmann et al, 1999;Sanders et al, 2015). These studies focused primarily on the impact of automobiles on social interaction.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing an analytical framework for liveable streets in Shanghai

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research explores how to understand the concept of 'liveable streets' in the context of Shanghai. It follows the Chinese State Council's call (2015) for ungated communities and dense street networks, meant to improve liveability in cities. Factors of liveability have been extracted from both the international and Chinese literature and refined through locally-administered online questionnaires (n=95) and semi-structured interviews (n=12) with a sample of urban studies professionals. The outcome of this research is an analytical framework consisting of qualities, factors and indicators to assess and distinguish what constitutes a liveable street in Shanghai. A minimal set of 28 indicators is proposed to facilitate the straight-forward application of the framework in fast-growing urban settings. This research reveals the importance of contextualizing liveability factors and their relevance in informing policy-making and the practice of urban design and planning in Chinese cities.

show abstract

Liveable streets in Hanoi: A principal component analysis

Cited by 29 publications

References 27 publications

Analysis of Urban Drivable and Walkable Street Networks of the ASEAN Smart Cities Network

Analysis of Urban Drivable and Walkable Street Networks of the ASEAN Smart Cities Network

Determinants of residential dissonance: Implications for transit-oriented development in Brisbane

Developing an analytical framework for liveable streets in Shanghai

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About