Lived experiences: a focus group pilot study within the MentALLY project of mental healthcare among European users

Abstract

Background: Mental healthcare is an important component in societies' response to mental health problems. Although the World Health Organization highlights availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of healthcare as important cornerstones, many Europeans lack access to mental healthcare of high quality. Qualitative studies exploring mental healthcare from the perspective of people with lived experiences would add to previous research and knowledge by enabling in-depth understanding of mental healthcare users, which may be of significance for the development of mental healthcare. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to describe experiences of mental healthcare among adult Europeans with mental health problems. Method: In total, 50 participants with experiences of various mental health problems were recruited for separate focus group interviews in each country. They had experiences from both the private and public sectors, and with in-and outpatient mental healthcare. The focus group interviews (N = 7) were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed through thematic analysis. The analysis yielded five themes and 13 subthemes. Results: The theme Seeking and trying to find help contained three subthemes describing personal thresholds for seeking professional help, not knowing where to get help, and the importance of receiving help promptly. The theme Awaiting assessment and treatment contained two subthemes including feelings of being prioritized or not and feelings of being abandoned during the often-lengthy referral process. The theme Treatment: a plan with individual parts contained three subthemes consisting of demands for tailored treatment plans in combination with medications and human resources and agreement on treatment. The theme Continuous and respectful care relationship contained two subthemes describing the importance of continuous care relationships characterised by empathy and respect. The theme Suggestions for improvements contained three subthemes highlighting an urge to facilitate care contacts and to increase awareness of mental health problems and a wish to be seen as an individual with potential.

Screening and referral is not enough: a qualitative exploration of barriers to access and uptake of mental health services in patients with cardiovascular diseases

“…Increased information regarding expectations around mental healthcare from referrers may also assist patients in considering access; yet may remain limited by referrer lack of knowledge or confidence without dedicated practitioner training [ 39 ]. Improved communication from referrers, including a steady stream of communication, has previously been suggested as a means to improve mental health services [ 41 ] and may be a means of supporting CVD patients in accessing services. Fragmented service delivery can also result in low uptake and understanding of mental health services [ 40 ].…”

‘C’mon, let’s talk: a pilot study of mental health literacy program for Filipino migrant domestic workers in the United Kingdom

“…It also leads to greater self-awareness in recognizing symptoms, identifying severity levels, and understanding triggers of their psychological distress. This helps facilitate the acknowledgement of mental health issues [ 73 ] to gain self-control and manage negative emotions. In a meta-analysis done by Banish and his colleagues [ 74 ], a culturally adapted intervention was found to be more effective than unadapted versions of the same intervention.…”

Mental Health Professionals’ Attitudes Towards People with Severe Mental Illness: Are they Related to Professional Quality of Life?

“…According to the literature, stigmatization has a profound and deleterious impact on people facing severe mental health challenges (Świtaj et al, 2016 ). Moreover, mental health service users feel the brunt of stigmatizing attitudes and behaviors, as well as the systemic obstacles in receiving adequate and sufficient mental healthcare (Axelsson et al, 2020 ). This stigma cycle breaks down the “chain of care”, adds to the mental healthcare gap and diminishes MHPs ability to provide responsive care (Triliva et al, 2020 ).…”

“…The MHPs described how insufficient funding, human resources, and availability of appropriate treatments render mental healthcare inaccessible (Triliva et al, 2020 ). Similarly, service users related difficulties in obtaining care, treatment tailored to their needs, and respect and recognition for their potential (Axelsson et al, 2020 ).…”