2019
DOI: 10.1177/1609406919875891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lived Experiences of a Community: Merging Interpretive Phenomenology and Community-Based Participatory Research

Abstract: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) and interpretive phenomenology, when merged, can provide insight into the experiences of a homogenous community. The purpose of this manuscript is 2-fold. First, we aim to provide a conceptual view of merging methodological approaches of phenomenology and CBPR. Principles of interpretive phenomenology, the philosophical stance, and the qualitative analysis methodology, as well as how interpretive phenomenology is complementary to CBPR, are reviewed. Second, the uti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these interview guides were co-created by the patient and family member co-investigators, aligned with the ethos of PCOR. 28 This approach (of the interviewees co-creating the interview guides) allowed for maximum co-construction of knowledge and co-ownership of the research, central tenets of community-based participatory research 29 , 30 (including PCOR). 31 The first step in designing the interview guides was reviewing the PCOR engagement literature and the PCORI Engagement Tool and Resource Repository.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these interview guides were co-created by the patient and family member co-investigators, aligned with the ethos of PCOR. 28 This approach (of the interviewees co-creating the interview guides) allowed for maximum co-construction of knowledge and co-ownership of the research, central tenets of community-based participatory research 29 , 30 (including PCOR). 31 The first step in designing the interview guides was reviewing the PCOR engagement literature and the PCORI Engagement Tool and Resource Repository.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The original study purpose, described herein, was to query stakeholders about the needs and resources, regarding PD, in their rural state. Our previously published articles 22,23 describe the outcomes 22 and methodology used 23 for a separate analysis solely addressing the resource of support groups. A separate analysis was conducted for support group information because of the magnitude of data provided on the topic as well as the categories and concepts that emerged from our preliminary analysis.…”
Section: Methods Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The methodology of this analysis is also published elsewhere. 23 Aspects of support group findings, however, are briefly described herein because they are essential in gaining a holistic view of barriers and resources described by stakeholders. One way to improve this access issue was "online support groups," suggested by some stakeholders.…”
Section: Access-related Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, by exploring participants’ experiences ideographically, researchers describe the particulars of individual experiences and convey their commonalities, rather than deriving a general theory through analysis of a population (Pietkiewicz & Smith, 2014; Smith & Osborn, 2015). It is the shared creation of understanding between the researchers and participants, within a particular context, that makes IPA congruent with the aims of participatory research, in which the meaning of experiences is also co-created (Bush et al, 2019)…”
Section: Community Advisor Recommendations and Researcher Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%