Livelihood Security of Farm Households in Eastern  Dry Zone of Karnataka - An Economic Analysis

Bhavya, A. P.; Ashwini, B. C.; Umesh, K. B.

doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.908.331

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The sub-indicators were first normalized (Bhavya et al, 2020;Sridhara et al, 2022, Sendhil et al, 2018 to the scale of zero (0) and one (1), premised on their functional relationship with the livelihood security. The indicator has a positive relationship ("more is better") then equation (a) and if the indicator had negative relationship ("less is better") then equation (b) was employed.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Composite Livelihood Security and its Determinants Among Rural Households

Mishra

Ravi²,

Verma

et al. 2023

ijee

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study was conducted during 2022 in Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh to analyze the livelihood security of rural households. Data was collected from 515 households through personal interview method using kobo collect. Landless and marginal farmers were more food insecure in the region. Forty four % of the households were food insecure. Composite livelihood security index was constructed using six domain indicators viz., habitat, health, economic, food, nutrition and social participation security. The weight for each domain indicator was derived from principal component analysis. The composite livelihood security index was 0.44 among the respondents. The livelihood security was high for medium farmers (0.46) followed by small farmers (0.45). Farming experience, social participation, livestock possession, income, calorie intake, body mass index and wealth significantly influenced the livelihood security. Lack of awareness on pest and disease control and poor price realization were the major constraints faced by the farmers. Technological, institutional and policy interventions are necessary to enhance their livelihood status.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%