Livelihoods, leadership, linkages and locality: The Simbo for Change project

Abstract

This paper analyses the ‘Simbo for Change’ project in the Western Province of Solomon Islands, a collaboration between Simbo leaders and a Samoan non‐governmental organisation (NGO), with funding provided by the Australian aid programme. We explore the role of local leadership in catalysing an island‐wide community development project that has generated new livelihoods opportunities and led to greater community cohesion and more proactive governance. By mobilising around a ‘collective subject’ (Simbo as an island community), the project allowed existing skills and practices to be revalued and extended, particularly in relation to chiefly governance and the standing of women in the community. While mobilising the island scale was important in building social cohesion and support for livelihoods activities, this was not a parochial identity but was redefined by stronger connections to off‐island markets, organic accreditation for Simbo, renewed interest from provincial and national government authorities and by the enduring trans‐Pacific friendships established with the Samoan NGO and its trainers. The case study provides an example of the constructive potential of the island scale in Melanesia, whereas other recent studies of similar scale‐making processes have focused on violent conflict generated by industrial scale mining.

Innovation systems and affordances in climate smart agriculture

“…Whilst this approach aimed to circumvent some of the challenges found in the IACCA-EUM programme, as Jabeen (2018) notes, "bypassing the elite and giving key positions to the poor might create friction (even if transitory) in a community" (pp.264), and damage social cohesion. Social cohesion and livelihood opportunities are closely linked (Suti et al, 2021;Jensen, 2019) and have been shown to be critical for building livelihood resilience (Mitra et al, 2017;Townshend et al, 2015). Some argue that institutional arrangements cannot be transferred, such as with technologies, but that they should emerge from the context in which they operate (Biggs, 2007).…”

Gendered Ambition and Disappointment: Women and Men in a Vernacular Language Education Movement in Melanesia

“…The Kulu Language Institute resonates with other grassroots social movements that have re-valued local ways of life in periods of rapid social, economic and political change. One such movement has been thriving in Ranongga's nearest neighbour-the 'Simbo for Change' movement focuses on local livelihoods and has inspired a 'revitalised ethic of care for the island' (Suti, Hoatson, Tafunai & Cox, 2020). Many such movements have centred on what is known in neo-Melanesian languages as kastom.…”

‘We are happy to tell you the sisimol stories (small stories)’: Reframing what counts as conservation work in the Arnavon Islands, Solomon Islands

“…Community‐led efforts and traditional knowledge systems that prioritise active local communities in leading adaptation strategies have emerged as central strategies in responding to these significant challenges (Salick and Ross, 2009; Mcleod et al ., 2018; Roche et al ., 2020). Such approaches work because they incorporate collective, community‐based responses to environmental, economic and social challenges which better reflect Melanesian culture (Suti et al ., 2021). Throughout the Pacific Islands, indigenous peoples have extensive knowledge of the land and sea environments and long records of successful management of ecological environments (Brodie et al ., 2013; Lebel, 2013; Fache et al ., 2016).…”