2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45294-x_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liveness Verification of Reversal-Bounded Multicounter Machines with a Free Counter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases Presburger formulae are built: our proof is based on a run analysis whereas the proof in [16, Theorem 1] builds directly the formula. We believe our treatment is more uniform and it generalizes notions presented in [19,10]. Moreover, our run analysis for proving Theorem 2 is interesting for its own sake, see [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In both cases Presburger formulae are built: our proof is based on a run analysis whereas the proof in [16, Theorem 1] builds directly the formula. We believe our treatment is more uniform and it generalizes notions presented in [19,10]. Moreover, our run analysis for proving Theorem 2 is interesting for its own sake, see [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However this does not entail that problems involving infinite runs are decidable, since infinite runs are not necessarily effectively representable in Presburger arithmetic, see e.g. [10]. In this paper, we study problems of the form: given a counter system S, a bound r ≥ 0 and a formula φ, is there an infinite r-reversal-bounded run ρ such that ρ |= φ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A major property of such operational models is that reachability sets are effectively definable in Presburger arithmetic [28], which provides decision procedures for LTL existential model-checking and other related problems, see e.g. [12]. However, the class of reversal-bounded counter automata is not recursive [28] but a significant breakthrough is achieved in [20] by designing a procedure to determine when a VASS is reversalbounded (or weakly reversal-bounded as defined later), even though the decision procedure can be nonprimitive recursive in the worst-case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%