Objective
To compare efficacy, survival outcome and prognostic factors of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) and 90Yttrium-radioembolization (Y90) for the treatment of liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NELM).
Methods
This retrospective analysis included 192 patients (58.6years mean age, 56%men) with NELM treated with cTACE(N=122), DEB-TACE(N=26), or Y90(N=44) between 2000 and 2014. Radiologic response to therapy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and World Health Organization (WHO) using peri-procedural MR imaging. Survival analysis included Propensity score analysis (PSA), median overall survival (MOS), hepatic progression-free survival, Kaplan-Meier using log-rank test and the uni-and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (MVA).
Results
MOS of the entire study population was 28.8months. As for cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90, MOS was 33.8months, 21.7months and 23.6months, respectively. According to the MVA, cTACE demonstrated a significantly longer MOS as compared to DEB-TACE(p=.04) or Y90(p=.032). The five-year survival rate after initial cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90 was 28.2%, 10.3% and 18.5%, respectively.
Conclusions
Upon PSA, our study suggests significant survival benefits for patients treated with cTACE as compared to DEB-TACE and Y90. This data supports the therapeutic decision for cTACE as the primary intra-arterial therapy option in patients with unresectable NELM until proven otherwise.