Liver Disease Prediction Using Ensemble Technique

Tanuku, Sai Rohith; Kumar, Addike Ajay; Somaraju, Sai Roop; Dattuluri, Rushitaa; Reddy, Madana Vamshi Krishna; Jain, S. K.

doi:10.1109/icaccs54159.2022.9784999

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The ensemble model combines multiple models to reduce the model error and maintain the model’s generalisation. Bagging, boosting, stacking, and voting are the four major classes of ensemble learning algorithms, and it is critical to understand each one and incorporate them into every predictive modelling endeavour [ 9 ].…”

Section: Ensemble Learningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ensemble Learning for Disease Prediction: A Review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Machine learning models are used to create and enhance various disease prediction frameworks. Ensemble learning is a machine learning technique that combines multiple classifiers to improve performance by making more accurate predictions than a single classifier. Although numerous studies have employed ensemble approaches for disease prediction, there is a lack of thorough assessment of commonly used ensemble approaches against highly researched diseases. Consequently, this study aims to identify significant trends in the performance accuracies of ensemble techniques (i.e., bagging, boosting, stacking, and voting) against five hugely researched diseases (i.e., diabetes, skin disease, kidney disease, liver disease, and heart conditions). Using a well-defined search strategy, we first identified 45 articles from the current literature that applied two or more of the four ensemble approaches to any of these five diseases and were published in 2016–2023. Although stacking has been used the fewest number of times (23) compared with bagging (41) and boosting (37), it showed the most accurate performance the most times (19 out of 23). The voting approach is the second-best ensemble approach, as revealed in this review. Stacking always revealed the most accurate performance in the reviewed articles for skin disease and diabetes. Bagging demonstrated the best performance for kidney disease (five out of six times) and boosting for liver and diabetes (four out of six times). The results show that stacking has demonstrated greater accuracy in disease prediction than the other three candidate algorithms. Our study also demonstrates variability in the perceived performance of different ensemble approaches against frequently used disease datasets. The findings of this work will assist researchers in better understanding current trends and hotspots in disease prediction models that employ ensemble learning, as well as in determining a more suitable ensemble model for predictive disease analytics. This article also discusses variability in the perceived performance of different ensemble approaches against frequently used disease datasets.

show abstract

Section: Ensemble Learningmentioning

confidence: 99%