2022
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.212325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver Fibrosis Assessment by Viewing Sinusoidal Capillarization: US Molecular Imaging versus Two-dimensional Shear-Wave Elastography in Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LS is commonly used to noninvasively evaluate liver fibrosis. However, the accuracy of measuring liver fibrosis can be compromised by inflammation, especially when ALT concentrations are increased[ 25 ]. In the present study, we found that liver condition, which is affected by both liver fibrosis and inflammation, was positively correlated with LS; this finding is consistent with those of previous studies[ 5 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LS is commonly used to noninvasively evaluate liver fibrosis. However, the accuracy of measuring liver fibrosis can be compromised by inflammation, especially when ALT concentrations are increased[ 25 ]. In the present study, we found that liver condition, which is affected by both liver fibrosis and inflammation, was positively correlated with LS; this finding is consistent with those of previous studies[ 5 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the contrast intensity after the destruction was from re‐perfused free‐circulating microbubbles only 18,19 . The quantification of the targeting contrast signal was calculated as the normalized intensity differences (NIDs [%]) = (pre‐destruction contrast intensity − post‐destruction contrast intensity)/pre‐destruction contrast intensity × 100%] 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 18 , 19 The quantification of the targeting contrast signal was calculated as the normalized intensity differences (NIDs [%]) = (pre‐destruction contrast intensity − post‐destruction contrast intensity)/pre‐destruction contrast intensity × 100%]. 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular imaging was first proposed in 1999 by Professor Weissleder from Harvard University at the International Imaging Conference held in Mississippi. Just as the name implies, molecular imaging can reflect changes at the molecular and subcellular level in vivo and conduct qualitative and quantitative research on biological behaviors ( Duan et al, 2022 ), which has been widely employed in the diagnosis and therapeutic applications of a variety of diseases ( Hughes et al, 2022 ; Miao et al, 2022 ), including atherosclerosis. Characteristics of vulnerable plaque, such as angiogenesis, inflammation, necrotic core, intraplaque hemorrhage, thin fibrous cap, and microcalcification can be assayed ( Bala and Cosyns, 2014 ; Dweck et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%