2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01562.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver Graft-to-Recipient Spleen Size Ratio as a Novel Predictor of Portal Hyperperfusion Syndrome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Abstract: Portal hyperperfusion in a small-size liver graft is one cause of posttransplant graft dysfunction. We retrospectively analyzed the potential risk factors predicting the development of portal hyperperfusion in 43 adult living donor liver transplantation recipients. The following were evaluated: age, body weight, native liver disease, spleen size, graft size, graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), total portal flow, recipient portal venous flow per 100 g graft weight (RPVF), graft-torecipient spleen size ratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
47
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Platelet count, which is generally affected by spleen size, had a negative correlation with spleen volume, but it had no correlation to PVP after reperfusion. Cheng et al 10 previously reported that the spleen volume was significantly associated with excessive portal venous flow and that a graft-to-recipient spleen size ratio of less than 0.6 might predict the development of posttransplant portal hyperperfusion. In their study, however, the definition of posttransplant portal hyperperfusion was more than 260 mL/min per 100 g graft liver weight measured by Doppler ultrasonography, which was associated with posttransplant hyperbilirubinemia and longer hospital stays, but was not a factor in patient survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Platelet count, which is generally affected by spleen size, had a negative correlation with spleen volume, but it had no correlation to PVP after reperfusion. Cheng et al 10 previously reported that the spleen volume was significantly associated with excessive portal venous flow and that a graft-to-recipient spleen size ratio of less than 0.6 might predict the development of posttransplant portal hyperperfusion. In their study, however, the definition of posttransplant portal hyperperfusion was more than 260 mL/min per 100 g graft liver weight measured by Doppler ultrasonography, which was associated with posttransplant hyperbilirubinemia and longer hospital stays, but was not a factor in patient survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings indicate that not only graft size but also hemodynamic status, especially spleen volume, should be considered in evaluating PVP after reperfusion. Recently, Cheng et al 10 revealed that the spleen volume was significantly associated with excessive portal venous flow measured by intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography just after reperfusion, emphasizing the graft-to-recipient spleen size ratio as a novel predictor of portal hyperperfusion syndrome in ALDLT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as in the normal population and for donors with uninephrectomy, the concept of size matching can be applied to organ transplantation, such as renal allografts or liver transplants. Small-graft-for-large-size recipients may encounter some clinical problems and various degrees of graft dysfunction, and such recipients have been associated with poor renal graft and hepatic allograft survival [1, 10]. In this study, graft failure related to small-graft-for-large-size recipients did not develop during this study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The recipients must satisfy the following criteria: the preoperatively calculated graft-to-recipient weight ratio should be 1% (the Urata formula [9] should be used to assess the graft weight); the preoperatively calculated graftto-recipient spleen size ratio should be 0.6 (according to the study by Cheng et al [10]). Recipient exclusion criteria are: United Network for Organ Sharing status 1 and 2A and previous transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.…”
Section: Recipient Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%