2013
DOI: 10.3747/co.20.1341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver Resection for Colorectal Cancer Metastases

Abstract: These recommendations apply to patients with liver metastases from crc who have had or will have a complete (R0) resection of the primary cancer and who are being considered for resection of the liver, or liver plus specific and limited ehms, with curative intent. 1(a). Patients with liver and lung metastases should be seen in consultation with a thoracic surgeon. Combined or staged metastasectomy is recommended when, taking into account anatomic and physiologic considerations, the assessment is that all pulmo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite positive results relating to metastasectomy in the literature, approximately two-thirds of metastatic colorectal cancer patients exhibit no long-term survival benefits. The factors that influence survival include poor tumor differentiation, increasing size and number of metastases, tumor staging, presence of extra-hepatic metastasis, elevated carcino embryonic antigen (CEA) levels and positive nodal status (Chua et al, 2011;Gallinger et al, 2013). The median survival rates depend on the presence or absence of these factors.…”
Section: Figure 3 Overall Survival Curve For 22 Patients Who Underwementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite positive results relating to metastasectomy in the literature, approximately two-thirds of metastatic colorectal cancer patients exhibit no long-term survival benefits. The factors that influence survival include poor tumor differentiation, increasing size and number of metastases, tumor staging, presence of extra-hepatic metastasis, elevated carcino embryonic antigen (CEA) levels and positive nodal status (Chua et al, 2011;Gallinger et al, 2013). The median survival rates depend on the presence or absence of these factors.…”
Section: Figure 3 Overall Survival Curve For 22 Patients Who Underwementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five-year survival after curative resection ranges 30%-40% (up to 60% in selected series), whereas less than 2% of patients are alive 5 years after diagnosis without surgical therapy (Castaing et al, 2009;Hsu et al, 2011). Various factors associated with survival after surgery for CRC liver metastases have been identified, including tumor-free surgery margin, TNM stage of primary tumor, disease-free survival, number of metastasis and preoperative CEA level (Gallinger et al, 2013). Recently, with the addition of new chemotherapy drugs and targeted therapies, a positive correlation between the tumor response rate and metastatic complete resection rate has been demonstrated in mCRC patients (Chua et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors state that heterogeneity and poor quality of the evidence were incompatible with a meta-analysis comparing different sequences of CT. The CCO guidelines are based on this last review [4]. In conclusion, neo adjuvant and adjuvant CT have not been compared directly.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Peri-operative and Adjuvant Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An initial search and critical appraisal of guidelines on CRC performed in September 2012 yielded 5 guidelines: a 2006 guideline by IKNL on liver metastases [8], a 2008 guideline by IKNL that did not address treatment of liver metastases [12], a 2011 guideline by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), a 2011 guideline by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, UK (NICE) [5] and a 2012 guideline by Cancer Care Ontario, Canada (CCO) [4]. We decided to update the literature from the search date of the IKNL 2006 guideline.…”
Section: Search For Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation