2016
DOI: 10.1111/tri.12855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver transplant recipients with portal vein thrombosis receiving an organ from a high-risk donor are at an increased risk for graft loss due to hepatic artery thrombosis

Abstract: Problem We hypothesize that recipients with pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis (PVT) receiving organs from high-risk donors (HRD) are at increased risk of HAT. Methods Data on all liver transplants in the United States from February 2002-March 2015 were analyzed. Recipients were sorted into two groups: those with PVT and those without. HRDs were defined by Donor Risk Index (DRI) >1.7. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess independent risk factors for HAT with resultant graft … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Villa et al previously demonstrated that prophylactic administration of low‐molecular‐weight heparin for 12 months prevented the development of de novo PVT in patients with compensated cirrhosis with an associated reduction in mortality and hepatic decompensation in the absence of any clinically relevant bleeding events. Our findings reinforce the importance of this study as preventing the development of PVT is of great interest, especially given the link between pretransplantation PVT and early hepatic artery thrombosis with its high morbidity and mortality within 90 days following liver transplantation . It is plausible that by using the PVT‐RI prospectively to identify those patients at greatest risk for developing PVT, future therapeutic studies could be developed to offer the most clinical utility and benefit to patient outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Villa et al previously demonstrated that prophylactic administration of low‐molecular‐weight heparin for 12 months prevented the development of de novo PVT in patients with compensated cirrhosis with an associated reduction in mortality and hepatic decompensation in the absence of any clinically relevant bleeding events. Our findings reinforce the importance of this study as preventing the development of PVT is of great interest, especially given the link between pretransplantation PVT and early hepatic artery thrombosis with its high morbidity and mortality within 90 days following liver transplantation . It is plausible that by using the PVT‐RI prospectively to identify those patients at greatest risk for developing PVT, future therapeutic studies could be developed to offer the most clinical utility and benefit to patient outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Our findings reinforce the importance of this study as preventing the development of PVT is of great interest, especially given the link between pretransplantation PVT and early hepatic artery thrombosis with its high morbidity and mortality within 90 days following liver transplantation. (26,27) It is plausible that by using the PVT-RI prospectively to identify those patients at greatest risk for developing PVT, future therapeutic studies could be developed to offer the most clinical utility and benefit to patient outcomes. Furthermore, identifying the group of liver transplant candidates at greatest risk for PVT development may offer an avenue for improved screening and surveillance practices.…”
Section: Original Article | 1753mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of donor factors is significant as riskier donor factors are associated with higher morbidity in transplant recipients. For example, there is an increased risk of HAT in recipients with PVT transplanted with organs from donors with a DRI > 1.7 . DRI was no longer significant when examining overall deaths in the Cox regression model, representing the role of retransplantation and subsequent patient survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, use of high‐risk donor livers (DRI ≥ 1.7) was associated with a significant increase in relative risk of allograft failure in each MELD category. In addition, the DRI was an independent predictor of development of complications (hepatic artery thrombosis, biliary complications, end‐stage renal disease), morbidity (increased cost of care and readmissions), progression of fibrosis among patients with HCV, and survival in selected subsets, such as those undergoing transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as those undergoing retransplantation …”
Section: Validation Of the Donor Risk Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%