2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver Transplantation Outcomes Using Grafts From Donors Older Than the Age of 80 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, with the growing use of elderly donors due to the unacceptable death rate in waiting lists, more favorable results have been demonstrated in recent studies using organs from donors older than 60, 70, and even 80 years of age …”
Section: Patient and Graft Survival Using Octogenarian Donors In Livementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, with the growing use of elderly donors due to the unacceptable death rate in waiting lists, more favorable results have been demonstrated in recent studies using organs from donors older than 60, 70, and even 80 years of age …”
Section: Patient and Graft Survival Using Octogenarian Donors In Livementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, with the growing use of elderly donors due to the unacceptable death rate in waiting lists, more favorable results have been demonstrated in recent studies (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34) using organs from donors older than 60, 70, (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) and even 80 years of age. (20,26,28,41) There remains, however, concerns about the higher risk for primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, and worst longterm graft survival with the use of these super-old septuagenarian and octogenarian donors.…”
Section: The Growing Gap Between Patients In Need Of Livermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,33,52 The effects of blood flow on vessels, and particularly on endothelial cells, are mainly due to wall shear stress, which can involve a multitude of physical and molecular mechanisms. 34,35,[53][54][55] However, it is difficult to know if portal thrombosis is the consequence or the cause of NRH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely a difference will be noted between two recipients of a donor only slightly above or below the investigated age cut-off (ie, a recipient of an 80-year-old allograft may be compared to the recipient of a 78-year-old allograft). [23][24][25][26][27][28] In addition without accounting for recipient characteristics, any comparison can be challenging. Comparing outcomes for a recipient with HCV or HCC to others may make any effect of the donor age irrelevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to the earliest published studies that showed poor initial function and worse overall graft and patient survival, 6,19,[28][29][30][31] but confirms the positive results of more recent studies. [23][24][25][26][27][28] This, however, should be taken in context, as although not statistically significant, the difference (2× increased of mortality) in survival may be clinically relevant, as the study is underpowered. A larger study using similarly matched controls would better answer this question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%