2017
DOI: 10.1002/lt.24758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver transplantation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in intention to treat: An attempt to perform an ideal meta‐analysis

Abstract: This meta-analysis compared the effects of liver transplantation (LT) and liver resection (LR) on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) small transplantable HCC or within Milan criteria. Articles comparing LR with LT for HCC, based on Milan criteria or small size, published up to June 2015 were selected, and a meta-analysis was performed. No randomized controlled trial has been published to date comparing survival outcomes in patients with HCC who… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
63
2
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
63
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgery and liver transplantation treatment are the most effective treatment for early stage HCC patients [2,3]. However, many patients were diagnosed as advanced HCC at their first visit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery and liver transplantation treatment are the most effective treatment for early stage HCC patients [2,3]. However, many patients were diagnosed as advanced HCC at their first visit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, treatment with these tyrosine kinase inhibitors provides only a 3‐month increase in survival . When liver cancer is identified in an early stage, tumor resection and liver transplantation offer the best 5‐year survival rates, at 47.9% and 59.3%, respectively . Sadly, most patients succumb to disease before a suitable donor can be found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,24,25 Although transplantation is considered superior to resection for patients with compromised liver function and inadequate future liver remnant, 4 the two treatment when an intention-to-treat analysis is utilized. [25][26][27][28] Indeed, delaying a potentially curative liver resection increases the likelihood of disease progression and, thus, compromises patient outcomes. 5,29 Due to the scarcity of available organs, upfront liver resection is currently performed for the majority of patients presenting with resectable HCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%