Living alone and mental health: parallel analyses in UK longitudinal population surveys and electronic health records prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

BackgroundPeople who live alone experience greater levels of mental illness; however, it is unclear whether the COVID-19 pandemic had a disproportionately negative impact on this demographic.ObjectiveTo describe the mental health gap between those who live alone and with others in the UK prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsSelf-reported psychological distress and life satisfaction in 10 prospective longitudinal population surveys (LPSs) assessed in the nearest pre-pandemic sweep and three periods during the pandemic. Recorded diagnosis of common and severe mental illnesses between March 2018 and January 2022 in electronic healthcare records (EHRs) within the OpenSAFELY-TPP.FindingsIn 37 544 LPS participants, pooled models showed greater psychological distress (standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.09 (95% CI: 0.04; 0.14); relative risk: 1.25 (95% CI: 1.12; 1.39)) and lower life satisfaction (SMD: −0.22 (95% CI: −0.30; −0.15)) for those living alone pre-pandemic. This gap did not change during the pandemic. In the EHR analysis of c.16 million records, mental health conditions were more common in those who lived alone (eg, depression 26 (95% CI: 18 to 33) and severe mental illness 58 (95% CI: 54 to 62) more cases more per 100 000). For common mental health disorders, the gap in recorded cases in EHRs narrowed during the pandemic.ConclusionsPeople living alone have poorer mental health and lower life satisfaction. During the pandemic, this gap in self-reported distress remained; however, there was a narrowing of the gap in service use.Clinical implicationsGreater mental health need and potentially greater barriers to mental healthcare access for those who live alone need to be considered in healthcare planning.

Sexual behaviours among MSM during the first COVID-19 lockdown not associated with risk of COVID-19 infection

“…Seropositive participants were more likely to be living alone. While it is well established that the pandemic had adverse effects on the mental health of those living alone, 40 there is less evidence on how living alone affected COVID-19 transmission and choices around protective behavior. However, a meta-analysis on household transmission found that counterintuitively those living in households with three or more contacts had higher secondary attack rates than those living in households with only one contact.…”