2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2020.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Living Donor Liver Transplant in Patients Aged 60 Years or Older: Experience from a Large Volume Centre in India

Abstract: Background: With ageing population and higher prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in older patients, more and more living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) are being considered in this group of patients as eligibility for deceased donor liver transplant is restricted to those aged 65 years and younger. However, the short-and long-term outcomes of this group have not been reported from India, which does not have a robust national health scheme. The aim of this stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding remained comparable when analyzing LDLT recipients ≥70y versus those <70y. This is in alignment with previous reports showing similar incidence of vascular and biliary complications between elderly LDLT recipients when compared to younger LDLT recipients 31 . In addition, our study is the largest cohort to date of such elderly population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding remained comparable when analyzing LDLT recipients ≥70y versus those <70y. This is in alignment with previous reports showing similar incidence of vascular and biliary complications between elderly LDLT recipients when compared to younger LDLT recipients 31 . In addition, our study is the largest cohort to date of such elderly population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, as specific comparison between older and younger recipients was not performed 28 . Most of the other reported experience is from single center reports, evaluating outcomes of adults ≥60–65y compared to younger LDLT recipients 29–36 . The present study is the first, to the best of our knowledge, specifically comparing outcomes of adult recipients ≥70y old undergoing LDLT versus DDLT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…4 Same survival has been reported by other centers; however, survival is inferior in recipients older than 60 years. 5,6 Studies from our center showed similar survival in patients with MELD scores of <25 and ≥25 and in patients with low GRWR (with selective use of portal inflow modulation). 7,8 In a large cohort of 405 patients with cirrhosis and HCC (accepted for LDLT using our expanded selection criteria), the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 70%.…”
Section: Survival After Ltmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Evidence for the use of older donors in LDLT has been conflicting. Several studies have shown comparable outcomes between use of older and younger donors 2–5 while other authors have demonstrated contradictory findings 6–13 . Given the lack of consensus on the use of older donors, this study aims to investigate the impact of donor age on recipient morbidity and mortality after primary adult to adult LDLT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown comparable outcomes between use of older and younger donors [2][3][4][5] while other authors have demonstrated contradictory findings. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Given the lack of consensus on the use of older donors, this study aims to investigate the impact of donor age on recipient morbidity and mortality after primary adult to adult LDLT. groups according to donor age: donors in 20s (D-20s) group, donors in 30s and 40s (D-30s and 40s) group and donors in 50s and 60s (D-50s &and 60s) group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%