2021
DOI: 10.1002/gps.5609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Living in rural area: A protective factor for a negative experience of the lockdown and the COVID‐19 crisis in the oldest old population?

Abstract: Objectives Some factors influence the experience of the COVID‐19 pandemic (health, loneliness, digital access...), but what about the living area? The objective was to compare between rural and urban areas, the psychological and social experiences of the older individuals with regard to the COVID‐19 crisis during the first French lockdown. Methods The sample included participants of three existing population‐based cohorts on aging. Telephone interviews conducted by psyc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, participants’ qualitative responses included very few explicit mentions of parks while suburban/rural dwellers expressed newfound advantages of larger private land ownership and low-density areas. Our findings support conclusions from a study of older adults in France demonstrating that rural participants were less likely to report symptoms of anxiety, depression, and feelings of imprisonment during COVID-19 lockdowns than people from urban areas ( Pérès et al, 2021 ). The differences observed by urban/rural status may be further explained by higher population density and limited opportunities to access private outdoor areas in urban settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly, participants’ qualitative responses included very few explicit mentions of parks while suburban/rural dwellers expressed newfound advantages of larger private land ownership and low-density areas. Our findings support conclusions from a study of older adults in France demonstrating that rural participants were less likely to report symptoms of anxiety, depression, and feelings of imprisonment during COVID-19 lockdowns than people from urban areas ( Pérès et al, 2021 ). The differences observed by urban/rural status may be further explained by higher population density and limited opportunities to access private outdoor areas in urban settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The ability to continue subsistence/traditional food-related activities may also provide a more secure access to nutritious and culturally meaningful foods. Existing studies also indicate that continued access to the outdoors can have a protective effect for mental health [ 18 ] , and other rural communities felt generally more prepared and adaptable for pandemic conditions [ 19 ] . Furthermore, historical resilience, traditional connection, and strong community may provide strength and support during the COVID-19 pandemic for Alaska Native people [ 20 ] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation could be that children living in rural counties did not experience drastic changes in living conditions during the initial stay-at-home orders compared with children in urban counties. Some research findings indicate that older adults living in rural areas had more social interactions during the initial COVID-19 stay-at-home orders (Pérès et al, 2021 ). Children in rural areas could have had more social interactions than their urban counterparts as well which could have increased the opportunity for report sources to observe and report CM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%