2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Living on the edge – The predicted impact of renewed hunting on moose in national parks in Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we evaluated differences in the distances of the moose records from key land cover categories: artificial surfaces as potential barrier and threat, broad-leaved forest as a preferred habitat for foraging and hiding, natural grassland and shrubs for foraging, wetlands, and waterbodies as habitats for hiding and avoiding heat stress (Borowik et al, 2018(Borowik et al, , 2020Beest et al, 2012;Courtois et al, 2002;Melin et al, 2016;Romportl et al, 2017;Tomek, 1977) for each time period. We tested data for normality and used ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test depending on normality of the data in R software (R Core Team, 2019).…”
Section: Environmental Data and Habitat Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we evaluated differences in the distances of the moose records from key land cover categories: artificial surfaces as potential barrier and threat, broad-leaved forest as a preferred habitat for foraging and hiding, natural grassland and shrubs for foraging, wetlands, and waterbodies as habitats for hiding and avoiding heat stress (Borowik et al, 2018(Borowik et al, , 2020Beest et al, 2012;Courtois et al, 2002;Melin et al, 2016;Romportl et al, 2017;Tomek, 1977) for each time period. We tested data for normality and used ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test depending on normality of the data in R software (R Core Team, 2019).…”
Section: Environmental Data and Habitat Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in this study, to obtain an accurate picture of the history and status of the moose population, we collected all available occurrence data from the region to (a) evaluate changes in moose distribution in the study area; (b) identify the main causes of mortality; and (c) analyze habitat selection to model the extent of suitable habitat. We expected that landscapes with water bodies, wetlands, and a heterogeneous mosaic of shrubs, meadows, and forests provide suitable habitat for the moose population (Beest et al, 2012;Borowik et al, 2018Borowik et al, , 2020Courtois et al, 2002;Melin et al, 2016;Romportl et al, 2017;Tomek, 1977), while anthropogenic structures would reduce the amount and connectivity of available habitat (Bragina et al, 2018;Mrlík, 1995;Ree et al, 2015;Seiler, 2005;Strnad et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our dataset comprised summer (June 1-August 31) locations of GPS collared adult moose in Biebrza NP -24 moose (13 females and 11 males) and in Polesie NP -12 individuals (10 females and 2 males) in 2012-2016 (Borowik et al 2018(Borowik et al , 2020. Out of all positions, we chose only fixes registered at 1 h intervals that led to a final database of 139,948 fixes in Biebrza NP and 32,652 positions in Polesie NP.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are clearly spatially separated [37,61,62]. This habitat structure in Biebrza drives spatio-temporal variation in food availability.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%